Wikipedia:Proposal to expand WP:CSD/Proposal IX (Deprecation)
Appearance
Proposal IX (Deprecation)
If any specific proposal from I to VII (or proposal X) receives a 70% majority of disagree votes, Wikipedia:Candidates for speedy deletion should explicitly rule it out as a criterion for speedy deletion.
Votes
Agree
Disagree
- BLANKFAZE | (что??) 00:03, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Neutralitytalk 00:11, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Ground 00:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Xtra 00:33, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- max rspct 00.34 1 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- David Gerard 00:40, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- ugen64 00:46, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- JRM 01:02, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
- MarkSweep 01:19, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Vamp:Willow 01:38, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- A lot of these are vague. How would we explicitly rule out something that's already unclear?--Sketchee 01:45, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- ‣ᓛᖁ♀ᑐ 02:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Rje 02:14, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Kevin 02:17, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Carnildo 02:34, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Antaeus Feldspar 02:46, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Peter O. (Talk) 02:52, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Ral315 03:21, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Sc147 03:25, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Ливай | ☺ 03:50, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Antandrus 03:58, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Adam Bishop 04:06, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- DJ Clayworth 05:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Ben Brockert 05:57, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 05:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Korath (Talk) 06:15, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Unnecessary. If an article does not fit the criteria for speedy deletion, it is not a speedy deletion candidate. --Slowking Man 07:47, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Jeff Knaggs 09:01, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Serves only to muddy the waters. RadicalSubversiv E 09:34, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Rafał Pocztarski 10:47, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Agree with Slowking Man. Wikimol 12:47, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Pointless. David Johnson [T|C] 13:29, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Tuf-Kat 14:42, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- BrokenSegue 15:15, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Jayjg | (Talk) 17:17, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Jrdioko (Talk) 17:53, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- RickK 21:32, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Thue | talk 21:55, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- hfool/Wazzup? 23:44, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC). Makes the whole thing a mess.
- BSveen 00:42, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Joshuapaquin 02:55, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- gK ¿? 03:36, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Frazzydee|✍ 04:09, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Walt Pohl 06:59, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- jni 10:16, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Ryan! | Talk 11:02, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Gentgeen 11:17, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Xezbeth 11:37, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Bucephalus 12:00, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Cyrius|✎
- Naive cynic 13:16, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Tompagenet 13:21, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Gamaliel 14:07, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Mailer Diablo 16:52, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Proteus (Talk) 17:39, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Either it is a candidate for speedy deletion, or it's not. I don't see the point of pointing out what's not on a list of what is outside of "everything else". -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 20:21, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keith D. Tyler [flame] 21:00, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC) Pointless.
- Shane King 01:43, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC) All policies should always be open to review. Why block off the potential to change our minds as circumstances dictate?