Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paras Tomar

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 October 8.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whether we consider the sock/IP arguments or not, it seems like there is no evidence of notability; neither hosting a TV show nor appearing in some works do in and of itself establish notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paras Tomar

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Irredeemably promotional autobio edited heavily by the subject and several SPAs and despite the claims I can find very little meaningful and independent coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 15:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a real public figure page... He is an Indian personality .Thus, this page should stay. Paras Tomar is an actor from India.. Celebrity — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.140.28.249 (talk • contribs) 2019-08-19 16:02:13 (UTC)— 175.140.28.249 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Someone vandalise this page but I don’t think it’s suitable for deletion . The previous edit , i do believe this page should be maintain with the restrictions of protecting the page . A page that is vandalise unnecessary. Please do look sensitively into it. Do remove the unnecessary items but please retain this page . Thank you very much as this page is truly edited . Thank you & do help in retaining this page .. I’m sure the protection will prevent this page from being vandalised . Thank you .. hoping a great help ! A page that deserves to be retained as due to some recent editing , a page that is visible for years should be retained . Do look into this matter . Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:d08:1028:54d1:25d4:e982:9f52:4d46 (talk • contribs) 2019-08-20 00:29:18 (UTC) — 2001:D08:1028:54D1::/64 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Weak Keep. It seems he's hosting a TV-Show in India and played in at least one movie and made appearance in few series [1] - R3lo sd (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hosting a show might be great for his career but ultimately has no impact unless he's received actual coverage, which afaict, he has not. Also iMDb is not a reliable source.Praxidicae (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong KEEP - This page has all the links that supports the documentation written. Research done & they are true. Wikipedia should retain this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:D08:1028:54D1:DA9:8146:12CE:F21A (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC) — 2001:D08:1028:54D1::/64 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete per nom. Also, @Praxidicae:, open SPI for person who made page. Sock votes are coming here. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 14:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - Article seems stable for past two days after being reviewed ! Valid to stay without any doubt now ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:D08:1A81:302A:407D:6546:B7DA:9490 (talk) 09:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC) — 2001:D08:1A81:302A::/64 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment Vote moved from top of page where it was improperly placed. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete most of the content, and acting credits from the article cant be verified through reliable sources, the subject fails WP:NACTOR, as well as WP:GNG. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
geez. This article's edit history is full of SPAs since like 2013-14. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. He appears to be very popular in India, and appears to have some coverage based on a quick search Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC), Delete Per nom Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 00:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Helloimahumanbeing Would you please provide the coverage you're basing this vote on? Praxidicae (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae As I said it was a quick search, looking it up again it doesn't seem like there is that much Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 00:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ignoring all the sockery, closing this as delete would be defensible at this point, but there's really not that much non-sock discussion here, so another week doesn't seem unreasonable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 16:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently he is a singer too https://music.apple.com/my/artist/paras-tomar/1250085500 . Guess this article has to rephrased once this discussion process is over !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:D08:1A00:7D94:6D18:CE7A:A76A:3FE5 (talk) — 2001:D08:1A00:7D94::/64 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

comment omg. One more keep vote by an account (not an IP), and this article will not be deleted. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - http://www.tfm360india.com/influencers/men/134-paras/ . Link found as he is a model . Article can be improved in future! https://www.dailyo.in/user/15180/parastomar Guess he is an avid in writing as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Divinejob (talk • contribs) — Divinejob (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

kindly read wp:rs, and wp:writer. The subject still does not pass notability. —usernamekiran(talk) 15:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG KEEP https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humaramovie This link proved that he is definitely part of this project Humara Movies called Baby Steps in 2017 ! In fact he produced it. This short film garnered decent praise ! YouTube page checked from the Wikipedia page & the movie is available ! Thus, subject is valid. Comment https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_More_Shots_Please! Subject is a part of the show. This show was a great hit in Amazon Prime & currently in midst of works for season 2. Guess, much validation found so far . https://music.apple.com/my/artist/paras-tomar/1250085500 . Subject is also a singer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Divinejob (talk • contribs) — Divinejob (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

For the final time, itunes, imdb and Wikipedia aren't sources. Even if you could use Wikipedia, that article confirms nothing more than someone was able to push some cruft through several years ago. Praxidicae (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass WP:NACTOR or heck, WP:GNG. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.