User talk:113.30.156.69

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 113.30.156.69, is registered to Net4 and may be shared by multiple users of a web host or colocation provider, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Editing from collocation providers is often disabled due to violations of our open proxy policy. If you need to use a collocation provider to access Wikipedia and you are unable to edit or create an account due to your colocation provider's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. You may also want to contact your network administrator and request that they contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on your proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

In response to vandalism, editing from this particular IP address or IP range may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your colocation provider to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to them for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 113.30.156.69, has made edits to Positional notation that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Your recent editing history at Astrology and science shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jc3s5h (talk) 02:13, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:113.30.156.69 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: ). Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 02:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Astrology and science

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:113.30.156.69 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: ). Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 22:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Continued edit warring about astrology

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a new complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. See also an alert below about WP:ARBPS. EdJohnston (talk) 23:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

APPEAL TO LIFT BAN

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

113.30.156.69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unfounded and misinformed block

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=unfounded and misinformed block |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=unfounded and misinformed block |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=unfounded and misinformed block |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

BLOCK due to baseless allegations by USR:VQuakr

I was blocked for "edit warring" on the article Mars Effect for including a SOURCED contribution, which was done in order to make the disgustingly biased article conform to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. The reality is that there was NO DISCUSSION about this particular contribution of mine. When I DID add this to the talk page recently, my comments were WHITEWASHED by the quack user, a clear violation of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_others'_comments .

The edit has to do with a paper that clearly states that the Mars Effect cannot be pinned on cheating parents, as stated in the last section of the page Mars Effect

Who so ever is responsible -- probably USR:EdJohnston -- for reviewing the complain by the user USR:VQuakr is either very unintelligent in that they have not the brains to actually review the edit I had made, or they are extremely Biased. I don't expect the ban to be lifted, but you should expect me to keep editing the article till the sourced claim is included. Either that or the my comment on talk page is refuted. 113.30.156.69 (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles about astrology are covered by WP:ARBPS

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 EdJohnston (talk) 23:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.