Jump to content

User talk:Zombiedude101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zombiedude101 (talk | contribs) at 11:28, 3 February 2020 (→‎Not eligible for unblock). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  BencherliteTalk 20:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll admit that I make some trolly edits when I'm in that kind of mood, but they always get undone so no harm done. But I do make constructive contributions sometimes. Like with the Melissa Hutchison page. Please? I'm sorry, alright.

Decline reason:

That's not exactly assurance that the behavior won't recur. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Excellent, just what we need, someone who likes to troll articles such as Hebrew language with charming edits such as this and the creation of LHS 1070B. Can't think how we'll manage without you, frankly. And Melissa Hutchison is an unsourced BLP of someone who appears to fail WP:ENT, so it really is a win-win situation for Wikipedia if we unblock you, isn't it? Do you want to try and write a more persuasive unblocking rationale for the admin reviewing your request? BencherliteTalk 21:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, it was stupid of me. And just to note I wasn't the one who added 'Negro', that was someone else, I just added the German flag. You said Melissa Hutchison was unsourced, but you're wrong. It has one source, and it's p damn obvious she exists anyhow. I'll admit that I have made edits/contributions which I shouldn't, but it's never been done with malice so much as a joke. I've made a good few contributions, however small, and if given the opportunity I can prove that I can make further contributions.

Decline reason:

I think you've shown us the type of edits we can expect. You've ignored many warnings and made racist/anti-Semitic edits. I don't see any reason to think you can control you "jokes". Kuru (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What happened previously was in the past, very much so into the past - I don't have any intent of stirring shite up here and want to make some constructive edits. It's a non-issue as, admittedly, I have another two accounts which I have periodically used over the years to make edits where needed, but I feel that for the sake of principle and setting affairs in order I would get this smear removed. I apologise.

Decline reason:

Your honesty is appreciated, but requesting an unblock whilst admitting to violating one of Wikipedia's core policies to evade that block... just.. no. Yunshui 雲水 09:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So that's it - 'no sell'? I just made a fairly honest point and admitted I used to be a shite, that I want to make things right. I haven't really been evading the block - I've had new machines, addresses, moved around etc over the years so it wasn't as if I went out of my way to circumvent anything - I merely made a point that I'm doing this on principle because it seems like the right thing to do. I apologise - and as I said before I'll not be causing further grief, I want to do something decent with this account. I even take responsibility for the people who 'borrowed' (I say this with air quotes because they never actually asked my consent) my account to plaster the more anti-semitic/REICHLAND type content that cropped up. What is there to lose? If I make a point of being a problem you can easily smash me down.

Decline reason:

So in addition to openly admitting to evading your block with multiple accounts, you now admit this account was compromised. There is not a chance this account will be unblocked at this time. I'm removing talk page access, you may request an unblock at WP:UTRS in the future. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20671 was submitted on Feb 19, 2018 11:40:58. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 11:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20719 was submitted on Feb 23, 2018 09:55:06. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #26079 was submitted on Jul 25, 2019 12:29:02. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 12:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #26082 was submitted on Jul 25, 2019 15:33:01. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Utrs, talk page access

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #28741 was submitted on 2020-01-29 08:07:24. This review is now closed.


.

I have restored talk page access so user may request unblock here.-- Deepfriedokra 10:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Well that's intriguing-- TPA wa not removed on this account. Well, we will see.-- Deepfriedokra 11:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

  • Let's talk about your sock puppets- please list them all for the last 6 months.
Before I start, I do not recall all of the accounts I've used over the years so just listing off what comes to mind. If I remember anything else I'll throw them in.
Thank you for hearing me out. Just to clarify, the account isn't compromised any more. I was in school at the time and had left it logged onto one of the machines there and left it, so someone had jumped on used it to make a few DEUTSCHLAND UBER ALLES-themed edits. To be frank, I was a little pissed off when I was told flatly that "there is no chance of an unblock at this time" and that firmly put me in the mindset of being on the defensive. So to be clear - nobody else has the login credentials, it's just me.
I think part of the confusion is well has been that I've edited from communal/shared IP addresses where there are many other users who access WP. So if they make any questionable edits, it looks as though I'm reverting to vandalism. That isn't the case for me. If I wished, I could go to the effort of changing my IP and creating a new sock and forgetting anything that happened after a few months. I don't want to do that. I honestly want to get things cleared up so I can contribute without having to act like a wanted fugitive and with a fairly clean conscience. If I was unblocked, the first thing I would probably do is return to the articles I had attempted to edit under the above aliases and restore my contributions, provided they didn't overlap with any current content. IE, the RCT articles, Steve Ward, Neall Ellis, the nVidia Maxwell controversy, Worm (and its sequel, Ward) etc.
I'll be up front and admit I'm fairly abrasive but partially because I feel like I've had to be on the defensive, a little bit - if you refer to my earlier unblock appeals I was trying to be honest and up front and because of what looked to me at the time like a blind adherence to the rules with no regard to the context of the circumstances behind them. Even though I hadn't done any wrong in my appeals, I was told talk page access would be removed and I would have to go to UTRS which is a one-way system and very frustrating to use. Because I had admitted to editing on various different IPs in the many years in between, I was told no. And again shut down when I said someone else had accessed the account without my consent back in 2013, then five years ago. The only major breach of WP policy I can really view on my part is the "sockpuppetry" though, again, I didn't edit articles in a malicious manner. You can check the accounts referenced above, I genuinely made an effort to contribute. I just got frustrated when those contributions were reverted blindly even though it could've been argued that at least some of them improved the content and quality of said articles. Zombiedude101 (talk) 10:49, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zombiedude101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The original reason for my block was vandalism, far back in 2013. As you can imagine, seven years is a long time and plenty enough for someone to come back with a change of heart. YES, I have been on WP between then and now making a few contributions. I don't recall what accounts these were all made on as it was a long time ago and I've had other things on my mind to be quite honest. I am not here to commit vandalism, I am here to contribute. I'll discuss above, preferably as the unblock template doesn't let you format properly, just makes a massive wall of text.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The original reason for my block was vandalism, far back in 2013. As you can imagine, seven years is a long time and plenty enough for someone to come back with a change of heart. YES, I have been on WP between then and now making a few contributions. I don't recall what accounts these were all made on as it was a long time ago and I've had other things on my mind to be quite honest. I am not here to commit vandalism, I am here to contribute. I'll discuss above, preferably as the unblock template doesn't let you format properly, just makes a massive wall of text. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The original reason for my block was vandalism, far back in 2013. As you can imagine, seven years is a long time and plenty enough for someone to come back with a change of heart. YES, I have been on WP between then and now making a few contributions. I don't recall what accounts these were all made on as it was a long time ago and I've had other things on my mind to be quite honest. I am not here to commit vandalism, I am here to contribute. I'll discuss above, preferably as the unblock template doesn't let you format properly, just makes a massive wall of text. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The original reason for my block was vandalism, far back in 2013. As you can imagine, seven years is a long time and plenty enough for someone to come back with a change of heart. YES, I have been on WP between then and now making a few contributions. I don't recall what accounts these were all made on as it was a long time ago and I've had other things on my mind to be quite honest. I am not here to commit vandalism, I am here to contribute. I'll discuss above, preferably as the unblock template doesn't let you format properly, just makes a massive wall of text. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Not eligible for unblock

I very strongly oppose unblocking this user. They've made a death threat against a sitting U.S. senator, see User talk:Zombiedude101z. They've engaged in block evasion in September, 2019 (at least), and are well aware WP:SO requires at least six months with zero edits. I suggest they are deliberately choosing not to address the many other problems raised over there. And finally, NinjaRobotPirate noted they are banned by the community; see here. No administrator is free to unilaterally lift a community ban, and they are not free to appeal for at least one year since their last edit. That would have been September 2020; if this current request fails, that will be February 2021. And to appeal, they must follow WP:UNBAN, so their appeal can be discussed by the community. --Yamla (talk) 11:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I never made a death threat against anyone, Yamla. If you want me to address any problems, raise them to me here and now. I'm bloody trying to do the right thing here, else I wouldn't be even bothering to appeal. In fact - what is the specific process I'm even supposed to follow? I explained before UTRS is a horrifically limited medium due to the character limit and the fact it is one way only, with no way to respond to administrators answering appeals or get further input. It feels a little like I'm talking to myself - you say I'm deliberately choosing not to address issues, well I feel the same can be said in reverse sometimes. Zombiedude101 (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zombiedude101&oldid=938952316"