Jump to content

User talk:Path slopu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 90.255.163.190 (talk) at 20:53, 21 February 2020 (Reverted edit to Enfield Lock article: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Marcus Schrenker

    Hi. THanks for your message. I spent hours fixing bad information and links. I believe it is important to be accurate and there were so many glaring inaccuracies. I don't understand how this can be construed as non constructive. The Wikipedia strives for accuracy and objectivity. I hope you have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonbrauer1968 (talkcontribs) 6:59 pm, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

    January 2020 at Women in Red

    January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


    Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

    Online events:


    Editor feedback:


    Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

    Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

    Happy First Edit Day!

    @CAPTAIN RAJU:Thank you very much.--PATH SLOPU 15:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2020)

    The Serengeti ecosystem is a geographical region located in northern Tanzania, Africa. It spans approximately 30,000 km2 (12,000 sq mi), and hosts the second largest terrestrial mammal migration in the world. Pictured is a leopard in a tree in the Serengeti.
    Hello, Path slopu.

    The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

    Serengeti

    Please be bold and help to improve this article!


    Previous selections: Prayer meeting • Computer hardware


    Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


    Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

    The Signpost: 27 January 2020

    18:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

    February with Women in Red

    February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155


    Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red.

    Online events:


    Editor feedback:


    Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

    Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

    --Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    Administrators' newsletter – February 2020

    News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

    Guideline and policy news

    • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
    • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

    Technical news

    • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
    • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [4]

    Arbitration

    • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

    Miscellaneous



    This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2020)

    The The Dapper Dans are a barbershop quartet that performs at Disneyland in Anaheim, California.
    Hello, Path slopu.

    The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

    Barbershop quartet

    Please be bold and help to improve this article!


    Previous selections: Serengeti • Prayer meeting


    Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


    Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

    20:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

    Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12

    WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report

    Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report

    Our 2019 Annual Report is now ready for review.

    Highlights:

    • Overview of Backlog-reduction progress (a record low backlog!);
    • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
    • Automated archiving of requests;
    • Membership news and results of elections;
    • Annual leaderboard;
    • Plans for 2020.
    – Your Guild coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.
    To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

    MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2020)

    The Pyramid Texts are the oldest known corpus of ancient Egyptian religious texts dating to the Old Kingdom.
    Hello, Path slopu.

    The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

    Religious text

    Please be bold and help to improve this article!


    Previous selections: Barbershop quartet • Serengeti


    Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


    Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

    19:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

    New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

    Hello Path slopu,

    Source Guide Discussion

    The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

    Redirects

    New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

    Discussions and Resources
    Refresher

    Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

    Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

    To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

    16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

    This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2020)

    The metric length of one kilometre is equivalent to the imperial measurement of 0.62137 miles.
    Hello, Path slopu.

    The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

    Length

    Please be bold and help to improve this article!


    Previous selections: Religious text • Barbershop quartet


    Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


    Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

    16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

    Reverted edit to Enfield Lock article

    Good day Sir,

    On my talk page [[10]] you advised that you reverted my recent edit to Enfield Lock because I did not adequately explain why. The information is outdated as my change description made clear. It refers to the previous MP and the MP before her. I removed this section because neither MPs are current MPs following the 2019 general election and the information is therefore factually incorrect and of little merit in preserving. I did not amend the information because any replacing information would have minimal value - the current MP's name only. This is a page about a locality Enfield Lock and not the constitueancy Enfield North where any relevant information would be best recorded. Please either reinstate my edit or amend the page but do not leave incorrect information.

    Regards, 90.255.163.190 (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)90.255.163.190[reply]