Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aftermath Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath Music

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since creation in 2005 (!). No indication passes WP:GNG. Loksmythe (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Loksmythe (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loksmythe (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The label's roster suggests it meets WP:MUSIC's sense of "one of the more important indie labels", and the Norwegian article on the label includes a couple of Norwegian-language sources. Referencing using Norwegian (and maybe German) sources is likely to be more fruitful than looking for English-language sources. Chubbles (talk) 18:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. Web searching can return results in multiple languages and everything I've located (and there are mostly PRIMARY sources) shows that the references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There really aren't that much reliable sources. It doesn't pass GNG due to the lack of non-primary sources, because when I googled it, everything was a primary source. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 05:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Chubbles erroneously cites WP:MUSIC which applies to musicians and not record labels. Record labels are subject to WP:NCORP which requires WP:SIGCOV in multiple sources and there is none. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.