User talk:Cabin2015

Welcome!

Hello, Cabin2015, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Master Music Publications, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Master Music Publications

The article Master Music Publications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Master Music Publications (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cabayi (talk) 12:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cabin2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m not a sockpuppet Cabin2015 (talk) 12:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You need to address the overlap in editing. Yamla (talk) 12:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cabin2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I stated previously, I have made edits outside of the company MMP, including on Trinity Laban and Steinway. When I discovered MMP on Instagram, and saw it wasn’t on Wikipedia, I saw an opportunity to contribute, and I have spent many hours doing so. MMP deserves to be here, as they publish sheet music by notable people, in the same way Faber Music, Carus-Verlag and many, many others. If they don’t belong, nor do many more pages, including the company I mentioned. I contributed in helping Wikipedia contain up to date information about the modern classical music niche. When an article does not exist on Wikipedia, the message welcoming ones to contribute was very friendly, I was not aware that behind the scenes Wikipedia is such a hustle place, where editors such as Smerus (who maintains a page about himself -yes declared- and also his late sister -not declared) are so vile, condescending and patronising to contributors. Why should anyone give there time freely to try and improve Wikipedia’s information if they are treated so appallingly? I now sincerely regret, one the time I put into this platform, and the donations I made. Keep me blocked if you like, but please, in the words of Caroline Flack, be kind. The world is a sucky place, especially at the moment, and unappreciative, condescending keyboard warriors are just adding to negativity. Perhaps other administrators can see this, so they understand the experience some contributors have, and the condescending nature of some of its admins - (list of administrators redacted to prevent further pings; see page history for list) (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In what way does this not address the reason for my blocking?

“ I have made edits outside of the company MMP, including on Trinity Laban and Steinway. When I discovered MMP on Instagram, and saw it wasn’t on Wikipedia, I saw an opportunity to contribute, and I have spent many hours doing so. MMP deserves to be here, as they publish sheet music by notable people, in the same way Faber Music, Carus-Verlag and many, many others. If they don’t belong, nor do many more pages, including the company I mentioned. I contributed in helping Wikipedia contain up to date information about the modern classical music niche. ”

Am I right in saying that unless I write about a variety of pages I am not welcome on Wikipedia? What about people specialising in topics? Cabin2015 (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Master Music Publications

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Master Music Publications, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 12:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]