Jump to content

Talk:Tariq Jamil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Monatowfik (talk | contribs) at 23:55, 26 May 2020 (→‎Protection: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconIslam Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Jameel" vs "Jamil"

It appears that most sources use "Jameel". If someone thinks it should be changed, please explain and provide sources. Please do not change links, titles in references, etc. --Ronz (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't change in indian subcontinent people call name by different sounds and words. Slaveraza (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

actually it normally refer as jameel but the actual documents of the person have spell with jamil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullahsheikh7 (talkcontribs) 09:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I'm not clear that there's been enough coi-influenced editing to justify the article tag, but I've restored it in the hope that it will help resolve some of the recent editing problems. --Ronz (talk) 15:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism on Tariq Jamil

Please add Criticism on Tariq Jamil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiacc97 (talkcontribs) 13:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not consistent with Wikipedia BLP policies. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@GorgeCustersSabre: What? Why not? --Saqib (talk) 14:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image

@GorgeCustersSabre: You could have altered the wording instead of outright removing a sourced and uncontroversial passage. "Is said" is absolutely fine wording and can be found in several BLP's. However I've changed the wording for now. Instead of hard reverting next time, please take time to debate. --Saqib (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Views on COVID-19

Tariq Jamil’s statements on the cause of the COVID-19 outbreak, and public criticism by government ministers and other figures, are certainly notable enough to be included, and the section is reliably sourced. Jamil’s fans have repeatedly tried to remove the section or modify it to read benignly. I hope my fellow editors can help to keep this section neutral, factual and reliably referenced. Thanks, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Request to include his recent twitter clarification and support conferred to him also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.149.18.34 (talk) 06:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

This page used to be protected earlier and only verified users could edit it.

I think that protection has now been removed and there has been a lot of back and forth between real users and the following:

39.45.7.53 39.32.208.14 39.32.208.14 173.72.148.88 39.36.217.252 157.47.32.31

Can someone with the right privileges please protect the article again? Thanks!