User talk:KevinTheGuy

Welcome!

Hello, KevinTheGuy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:14, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blockbuster LLC. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 03:58, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Blockbuster LLC, you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 (talk) 07:10, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Blockbuster LLC. GoneIn60 (talk) 04:15, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NOTICE: This is a copy of my warning and advice left for you at Talk:Blockbuster LLC: @KevinTheGuy: I spent an hour or more at the Teahouse yesterday, explaining PRECISELY why you cannot change disputed content based upon a rubbish source. (see my last diff in that thread here). Yet two hours later you are back with a new thread, still arguing the toss again, pretending that the issue is that GoneIn60 has a personal dislike of your source. That is not true. There is now a clear consensus against it (and from various forums that you've shopped at), and so its fair to say that we all have a dislike of your source, and neither it nor its contents is going to be allowed to be used here. Savvy? This continued insistence on using it or its contents is not only non-constructive but also seems now to be disruptive. Changing content based on a poor source, but not actually citing that source is worse that making the same changes with a source. But neither are acceptable, and you have been told multiple times not to do that, but you don't seem to hear.

I now must ask you to stop trying to add disputed content based either on either no source, or on a non-reliable source. "Stuff you happen to know or have found out" has no place on Wikipedia unless it can be verified to a reliable source. Your source is not reliable. So stop trying to argue it back in, or you will face being blocked for disruptive editing. You have already had three warning[s] about this on your talk page, and I will repeat this message on there so that you appreciate that an administrator like me will not tolerate continued arguing and editing against consensus or edit-warring over a number of years. As I have already advised you: DROPTHESTICK. I'm sure there are many other articles you would be better off spending your time and editing skills on improving. You can't win every battle here, even if you believe you're right. So it's time to move on. Do I make myself clear? Nick Moyes (talk) 10:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you, @Nick Moyes:

At least GoneIn60 was still willing to talk to me about unrelated revision and editing of which you had zero place in joining in on.

And he’s actually a cool guy, all in all.

Get off of my talk page. KevinTheGuy (talk) 14:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. N.J.A. | talk 16:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi KevinTheGuy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Citation keeps getting removed, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]