Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Premeditated Chaos (talk | contribs) at 17:05, 22 June 2020 (→‎File:Essjay 666.gif: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

June 12

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No valid policy-backed arguments to keep. Also noting that at time of writing, this image has already been removed from the article by another editor -FASTILY 01:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:PS5, PS5 Digital Edition, DS5.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NCLI (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

While the console is not yet out, the release date is within the next few months and there are bound to be press events where free images can be taken. This fails NFCC#1. Masem (t) 00:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. The rule is "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." Nothing in there about "near future". Currently, there is no way to create a free equivalent, and with COVID-19, god knows when there will be. Obviously it will be possible after release, but I don't see anything here that makes me think that would disqualify us from using a non-free file until then. Besides, release may be in as much as half a year, if there are no delays. That's not "a few months" in my book. NCLI (talk) 00:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails NFCC 1. Technically a freely licensed version could be released today, it's just that Sony and everyone with access to the finished version have not chosen to do so. This is the same logic we use for disallowing non-free images of living people; we could get a free version at any time, and them choosing not to release one doesn't impact the NFCC. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Under that logic, surely no non-free content should ever be allowed, since the copyright holder could choose to re-license the content under a free license at any time. NCLI (talk) 14:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buck, Right Friends.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NewTestLeper79 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This does very little, if anything, to add educational value to the page. Fails WP:NFCC#8. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 17:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC(talk) 17:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Essjay 666.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Acetic Acid (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

orphaned image that is unlikely to have future encyclopedic use. Previous proposed deletion in May by Fastily "unused, low-res, no obvious use" which was declined by Spinningspark with edit comment: "Decline. Files once used in articles should be kept to preserve integrity of article history"  ★  Bigr Tex 23:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.