Talk:Claire Fox

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Politics of the United Kingdom Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union C‑class Low‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

BLP and libel case against Living Marxism

I previously removed the text regarding the libel case against Living Marxism [[1]], because the source cited for this doesn't mention Claire Fox, and including text regarding this libel case on Fox's BLP implies Fox committed libel or was involved in libel. She was previously co-publisher of Living Marxism, so it seems possible she was involved in this, but per BLP, I think we'd need a source saying this, I don't think we can conclude this based on original research or coatrack it in in connection to Living Marxism. I don't think this should be restored to Claire Fox's bio without a reliable source which actually mentions Claire Fox. --DynaGirl (talk) 13:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting the reliably sourced fact that the magazine Living Marxism was closed down after a libel case is not a violation of BLP, nor does it imply that she personally held the views that led to the magazine being sued, though legally authors and publishers are equally liable in libel cases. MaxBrowne (talk) 13:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But the source used to reference this doesn't mention Claire Fox and doesn't mention the publication closing. It doesn't actually support the text added. --DynaGirl (talk) 11:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LM clousre

The verifiable fact that the Living Marxism magazine was wound up following a libel case is not a violation of BLP. MaxBrowne (talk) 16:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misrepresenting the source to say something about Fox that doesn't appear in that source is a violation of BLP as well as WP:SYN. And the "verifiable fact" that the magazine shut down as a consequence of that case isn't particularly relevant to this article, and in addition it isn't isn't mentioned in that cited source, therefore it is not verifiable by that source. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claire Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514175501/http://www.wdm.org.uk/news/events/heat/freemarketstream.htm to http://www.wdm.org.uk/news/events/heat/freemarketstream.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

She has also been criticised...

Isn't this weasel wording? We could also say "She has been praised..." right? Olive Hat (talk) 07:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone ever praises her, then go for it. If. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's weasel wording. Why have praise or criticism. What's wrong with "She believes...", "She has said..."? This article is appalling for its bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.229.8 (talk) 16:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article reads like a hit-piece. I guess the people who contributed to this article's criticism of her disagree with her politically.

I hope very much that people disagree with this person. Someone like her should never sit in the Lords.

Institute / Academy of Ideas

Should the Institute of Ideas and/or the Academy of Ideas be mentioned in the lead? Neither has its own article. JezGrove (talk) 23:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]