User talk:Curb Safe Charmer

AfC submissions Random submission

3+ months

1,647 pending submissions to update

Wikipedia ads	file info – #69

@Curb Safe Charmer: St. Joseph's Private School, Kuching

@Curb Safe Charmer: Hello,

This is Francislimsj. What are the copyrighted work that you meant on my draft on St. Joseph's Private School, Kuching? If you mean the material taken from the website of the school at https://stjosephkuching.edu.my/ how do I prove that I was the one who wrote those as well?

By the way, I cannot find my draft on Wikipedia? Where is it now so that I can edit it?

Thank you.

Jam Alker

Hi!

I wrote the article Jam Alker (September 18)

Can you please advise me on what the copyrighted material you found was? Thank you so much! I'm new to this, so I appreciate your guidance.

I don't know if it's appropriate to share the text I submitted here, so please let me know what the best way to do that would be. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkerjam (talk • contribs) 17:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

@Alkerjam: It was text copied from www.jamalker.com. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Warning!

It has reach to the level I have no respect over you. I have warned you to stop involving in my activities. I told you since, I don't your assistant anyone because you are not optimistic at all looking wrong side of my activities. This is absolutely rubbish, I'm creating draft and be involving your self. I don't need you and I don't want to your assist anymore. I have never seen anyone editing my draft except you. This isn't an article, I warn you not to involve in my activities. I don't know you, and I don't want your assistance. Stop involving your self in my draft. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 14:47, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

@Abbas Kwarbai: Please read WP:OWNERSHIP. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Stop interfering on my draft, why haven't you go and contribute to others. I said I don't need your assistance anymore. Continue wasting your time putting on your watchlist Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Warning!

I have warn you to stop appearing on Wikipedia edition. I don't know you, I don't need you help. Yesterday you clearly shows that you don't know what are you doing of saying Jersey is only from United States. Your edition is full of blunders. I have warn you to stop touching what I edit. I must appeal of what you have done to me for nomination of investigation against me which you were been proved wrong. Your have no work that's why you exhausting your time on me by reediting what I edited. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hush! Hush!

Following this your guess would be as good as mine, They have eventually voted a delete in the article they created, it’s obvious they aren’t interested in arguing because if they do, they’d know it’d just be digging a hole they’d eventually fall into as they their UPE/ sock-puppetry might be exposed hence they want this whole thing to end as soon as can be. Celestina007 (talk) 17:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Genevieve Leveille

Dear Curb, I have declared that on my talk page that I don't want to you to be following my edition and articles that I created despite the fact that Wikipedia is free and anyone can edit.

Regarding Genevieve Leveille article which I recently created. You inserted a template for contradictory which clearly shows that there is no reasonable link that says she is from United States, here is the link that said she is Haitian-american (https://www.plongaye.com/2019/11/14/une-haitienne-parmi-les-personnalites-les-plus-influentes-de-la-technologie-en-angleterre/) for this reason I'm going to remove the template for contradictory Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 10:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

@Abbas Kwarbai: Regarding your preference for me to not edit articles you created, please read Wikipedia:No-edit orders#"Stay out".

I am glad that you have found a source for her nationality. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Martina Fuchs

Concerning page, you deleted moderation and public speaking, please can you tell me rationale behind removing the heading and merging them in her career. Because I have look for numerous anchors Wikipedia page where they have public speaking and sometimes with moderation. If there is no any positive reason I will undo it from where it was. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 11:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

@Abbas Kwarbai: The sentence about the languages she can speak doesn't belong in a section about moderation or public speaking, and once it was moved to the section on education it leaves a single sentence. Per WP:PARAGRAPH and MOS:PARA we try to avoid having single-sentence paragraphs and single sentence sections. Public speaking and event moderation is part of her career, so it belongs in the career section.

Comparing one article to another is problematic because the other, older article may not be ideally written or laid out. If you can given some examples I will take a look. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dmitry Borisovich Volkov

Hello. Please take a look at the article. Thank you very much. 2A00:1FA1:57:4EC5:143C:B956:7C14:EC12 (talk) 09:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

There is a backlog of draft articles awaiting review. Someone will review it when its turn comes. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Jucradigital (talk) 13:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Change of username

Hi there

Sorry I'm VERY new to this and struggling to understand the proper process with all the reference material that wikipedia uses in its explanations.

I got the welcome note about my username and it should change.

How do I do this. I just tell you the new name I would like here?

Jucradigital (talk) 13:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@Jucradigital: To find out how to change your username please read Wikipedia:Changing username. However that wasn't the issue my message to you was about. Your username gives the impression that you are editing Wikipedia in a professional capacity, working on behalf of a client. If that's the case, you need to declare it before editing further. See WP:PAID. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@Curb Safe Charmer: - Ah very good. I think I have now done this properly on my talk page.Jucradigital (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

About Hueb Jewelry - Rejection

Hi,

Thank you for your response. I would be grateful to you if you can point out what additions I can make to the draft / article I have submitted for it to be accepted? I look forward to hearing from you.

Warm Regards Pratibha

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pratibha P75 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Pratibha P75: please read the message I left for you in the pink box at the top of the draft article or in the yellow box on your talk page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, my article got deleted before I could contest it

The reason why my page was deleted was that apparently, it was copied from https://eidain.com/kurulus-osman/. However, I didn't copy it from that page but that page copied it from an older version of the 'Cast and characters' section on Kuruluş: Osman section. Here is proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kurulu%C5%9F:_Osman&oldid=984825354#Cast_and_characters. What should I do? Limorina (talk) 07:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Limorina: You've asked the same question on the talk page of the administrator who deleted the draft. They are able to access the deleted draft and see if what you've said is valid. I am not an administrator and cannot see the deleted draft so I cannot help you. Please wait for Cabayi to reply to you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! Limorina (talk) 15:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Waterlism

Hi yes me again please look at this https://thoughtcatalog.com/john-w-howell/2013/05/how-to-start-your-own-religion/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by TacoDr3w (talk • contribs) 14:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@TacoDr3w: we are all volunteers here, and we have better things to do than deal with the stuff you made up. Please stop. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the formatting

Hey thanks a lot for formatting my page. It was quite relief since this is my first submission. Regarding merging the page with Adams Bridge origin page, actually my page covers the controversy with respect to the canal project as well so I guess it's better to keep them this way. Thanks a lot again :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 08:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Bello Lafiaji

What's the essence of putting template of the neutrality of this article is disputed. Why do injure my articles? I told you already to stop editing my articles. You sent me a link that talked about anyone can edit my articles because no one one article. Nonetheless, my declaration on my talk page is also significant issue; where I mentioned to stop appearing in my articles. Why do you concentrate on my articles because there are over thousands of articles to be considered. I warned you not to be involving on my articles, no any editor attack me other you. I don't know you and you too you don't know me. Why are you appearing in my Wikipedia life. Please and please stop editing or appearing in my Wikipedia articles even though no one own any articles. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Final draft

Hi Please check my draft. 1. There is a recommendation to merge the page with Adams Bridge origins page, my page covers a much wider topic and various controversies so the two need not be merged. Please let me know how to remove the merge suggestion

2.For some reason the Submit for Review button is not showing on my page can you please check if there is some backend problem. Sharing my draft link in the meanwhile.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ram_Setu_Controversy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 11:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bhumi2tandon: Thanks for your message. While you clearly have an opinion on whether your draft should become a standalone article, we should seek WP:consensus on this. If you look at Talk:Adam's Bridge you'll see that this is a sensitive subject with editors having different viewpoints. We should let others join the discussion. There's no rush.

If I were reviewing the draft at this point in its development I would want to see more reliable sources to back up the statements you've made.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes well thanks for your prompt response. The article has been written from a neutral point of view with relevant quotations and references. Since I have known the material since almost an year now. If you will notice the traffic in the Adam's bridge page you will find that there are hundreds of thousands of searches for the search word "Ram Setu" on Wikipedia,those searches are actually to understand these various debates over the Ram Setu issue only. Being a native of India I know that these various controversies are highly debated in the country. However, there is no wiki page to give the details of the various controversies.To give you an example a debate over Mr Trump does not just include his political policies, it may include his health,his life style etc. Thus this page covers various aspect of the information required to understand the controversy not just the origins.

Thanks again for making the links in my page :)) Bhumi2tandon (talk) 11:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bhumi2tandon: I am not suggesting that the content you've written is not valuable. On the contrary. But I think it could be used to expand the existing article. A separate article is appropriate if the main article becomes too long, but we're not at that point yet. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Actually if you think about it my page covers a wider topic, so may be merge the Adam Bridge origins page into mine only makes sense because otherwise the Sethusamudram Canal Project Controversy section of the page cannot be added to Origins page.

Actually my first preference would be to publish the page stand alone. Rest not aware of the rules much here since this is my first draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 12:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft UArchitects

Dear Curb Safe Charmer

I have made the changes to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UArchitects page. The promotional award section has been removed and i would like to publish the page. However i can not find how to officially do this.. could you tell me the steps ?Meimaar.93 (talk)

Greetings Meimaar.93 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meimaar.93 (talk • contribs) 11:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Meimaar.93: You only have one reference, and that appears to be text that the company has written about itself. Please add references that show that the company has been written about in depth by multiple reliable, independent publications such as books or national newspapers. The coverage should be WP:SECONDARY which means in this case that rather than those publications reporting about a new building being constructed that was designed by the firm, the writer should provide their own analysis, evaluation, interpretation of that project rather than just stating the facts about it. Once you have three such references, resubmit your draft for review. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit conflict

Hi Someone has edited my page by adding remarks within the page itself. Now when I correct the remarks its leading to an edit conflict. Kindly resolve the issue Link to my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ram_Setu_Controversy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 13:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bhumi2tandon: I don't know how to resolve an edit conflict for you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok no problem thanks for your help. But don't know why someone had to put remarks inside the page itself funny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 13:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Reviewed page Ram Setu Controversy

Hi Thanks for your review. Ok so those edits in my page were made by you, actually those edits were causing an Edit Conflict on my page when i was trying to make the recommended alterations. Was seeking your help for the Edit Conflict earlier if you remember. The recommended changes have been made the name of scientists added and citations given. Please check under the heading "Natural or human origins". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 15:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bhumi2tandon: Unfortunately as this comparison illustrates the sections titled 'Ramayana' and 'Abrahamic story' that I tagged as being unsourced are still unsourced. The statements like 'some scientists believe' and 'various scientists', 'various opinions have been expressed' are problematic. Please read WP:WEASEL for why. I see another user has reverted your re-submission of the draft, as those issues were not addressed. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi

First of all thanks a lot for your patience today.

Have removed the section with the 'scientists' part objected by you. But could you please help me understand the second objection.

The two sections for which you have recommended adding citations viz Ramayana (section summarising the story of Ramayana) and Adam (Summarising the story of Adam's peak) it's a bit difficult to give citations for these stories, since what is given in these sections is essentially a summary of the two stories given in Ancient Scriptures so giving citation for these summarised stories would be a little difficult since I'd have to cite the Ancient text Ramayana itself. So is it necessary to give a citation in a situation like this.

Here's the edited link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ram_Setu_Controversy#Natural_or_human_origins_controversy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 15:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bhumi2tandon: I presume there are other publications that have written about those stories, so you can add references to those publications. Even if you had to cite Ramayana itself, that would be ok - your sources don't have to be online, so long as someone with the time and inclination could find the material you refer to in a book in a library somewhere. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information on why we need citations and how to cite offline sources. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the suggestions to merge the Ram Setu Dispute article with two others

Hi Thanks a lot for your suggestion to merge the article 'Ram Setu Dispute' with the existing two pages on the topic. Subsequent to your suggestions and having gone through the proposed articles I would like to bring to your notice that my page traces the time lines of a "Media Controversy" and different aspects of various disputes that have been raised with respect to the Ram Setu at different points of time. My page is not about the academic angle as much as it is about the controversies and at that, the page covers not just academic controversies but legal as well. That's why it's been named Ram Setu 'Controversy'.

To give an example we have several TV shows that for example have episodes that update viewers about the controversy and the history of the entire dispute over the Berlin Wall or an episode that would cover the entire political history of tension between any two nations.

Being a native of India I know that this topic is hotly debated here and if you check the wiki search history the term "Ram Setu" is searched hundreds of thousands of times, this is because that is the term we use for the bridge in this part of the world and basically whole of South Asia. Wikipedia does not have a single page that covers the entire controversy from every angle.

The page is unique because the entire dispute pertaining to the Ram Setu from all the various angles, academic as well as legal and chronological has not been brought together by any other single page on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 04:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bhumi2tandon: thank you for expressing your viewpoint on the two proposed merges. We should now wait for others to comment. I see one has already done so in a comment at the top of the draft. It seems you are in a hurry for your draft to be published, but please be patient in letting others comment. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 06:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes sure thought I need to put forward my point of view since the opinions are being posted. Can you please give me the link where I can post my comment so that everyone can consider it before voting. Bhumi2tandon (talk) 06:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

At Talk:Adam's Bridge and Talk:Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project#Proposed merge. You can get to these easily by clicking the 'Discuss' link on the merge proposal tags on your draft. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 06:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot have posted my message there. Can you please let me know how many (minimum or maximum number) of opinions need to be taken before reaching a decision on the topic?

My first wiki page so am not aware of this process. Bhumi2tandon (talk) 06:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

A minimum of seven days. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 06:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok actually yes you are right, am in a bit of a hurry because I will be travelling in a few days so not sure how much time I'd be able to give it afterwards. Bhumi2tandon (talk) 07:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)