Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Robin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jen Robin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NCORP for small private company. Lots of minor coverage but nothing in-depth. scope_creep^Talk 17:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass WP:NBIO, promotional article. 1292simon (talk) 22:28, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : As written doesn’t fit notability but a quick google search shows there is likely enough Top tier articles And podcasts about her And her business to qualify. This should sandbox or just note as a stub. Juju (talk) 21:55, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first five reference in the google search are dependent sources, her branding. No one is saying there is not coverage, its the quality of the coverage that is absent. Quality matters. It needs to be independent, reliable and in-depth. It is simply her business on the web and it not reliable, nor independent for the most part. There is no secondary sources to speak of. scope_creep^Talk 22:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient independent reliable sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm undecided. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Founded a company 20 yrs ago and has 20 some employees. Nothing to make it stand out from others in the field. Oaktree b (talk) 20:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be a run of the article about a person going about their business and the sources are muh. So, I'm going with delete. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.