Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genevieve Leveille

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Genevieve Leveille

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 10:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It takes some effort to wade through this ref-bombed article, but at the end it amounts to not much as all. I am sure that she is a very competent business leader but there is nothing here that speaks to notability. Looks like yet another paid for bio. Fails WP:GNG. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the premise of notability here is being the CEO of AgriLedger as the lead sentence suggests then I don't think that holds water. AgriLedger doesn't appear to be a notable company. And if it was, we would have an article about it and redirect Leveille to it. The company appears to have at most 15 employees; no accounts have been filed for 2019 but as of November 2018 it was loss-making; Leveille has recently quietly resigned as a director according to the Companies House filing leaving her husband at the reins. With startups we must look at the enduring impact rather than the PR noise they generate.

I think notability hinges instead on her being a prolific public speaker at blockchain events, or could she meet WP:ANYBIO by being a finalist for an expanding list of awards. The events she has spoken at regurgitate a short bio presumably provided by Leveille, so I don't think that constitutes in depth or independent coverage. None of the awards are notable, and in other types of awards Wikipedia gives weight to winning an award rather than for being nominated for it.

Or does she meet WP:BASIC? The cryptocurryclub and fairfood references provide in-depth coverage but are interviews, which we don't consider to be independent. The only other reference providing in-depth coverage is fintechfiends and that is a blog site that profiles people working in fintech, presumably for a fee.

Her involvement in the ACChain debacle was a notable omission from the biography, which I have since remedied, but it gave me the impression that this article was a PR effort. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to have enough citations provided about her in industry-related sources, passes the smell test in my mind. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Fails to satisfy basic inclusion requirements, I can’t see in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources here. Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.