Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Themis Medicare

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Spartaz (talk | contribs) at 18:29, 28 November 2020 (→‎Themis Medicare: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 18:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Themis Medicare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of meeting WP:NCORP. References given are WP:ROUTINE and google searches not finding any WP:significant coverage. Article has been recreated and speedy deleted many times so if deleted, salting may be called for. noq (talk) 14:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The article is on a public limited pharmaceutical company in India. I feel that the article should not be deleted as many other Indian pharmaceutical companies in its peer group has similar Wikipedia articles. So, the article is likely to have reference value. Meanwhile the article has also been improved, and it can further improve with other experienced editors improving it over time. Thank you.Stim07 (talk) 07:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Logs: 2020-11 ✍️ create, 2019-03 G11, 2011-07 A7, 2011-07 G11
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 05:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.