Talk:Pornhub
Pornhub Awards was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 December 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pornhub. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pornhub article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Minecrafter0271 (talk · contribs) on 2 January 2020 with the comment: promotes a website with advertisements for prostitution It was contested by DannyS712 (talk · contribs) on 2 January 2020 with the comment: Object to prod, and misplaced notification |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The Site was originally launched in 2001
To say the beginnings of this conglomerate was in 2007 is inaccurate and a deception favoring PornHub's reputation. The site was originally launched in 2001 and busted due to plagiarism. The first recordings of the sites activity was recorded on February 01, 2001. To access the link you'll have to type in Porn Hubs address into their archive search as Porn Hub is a black listed url and it will not allow me to complete the url string as such. "Find the best web sites at pornhub.com!". 1 February 2001. Retrieved August 10, 2017. {{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(help) TheHandOfQueenErotica
This is completely ridiculous. I would like you to defend hour claim that dw.com is not a reliable source. Also the petition is a seperate relevant event, so Gaz405 does not repeat the same incidents the upper pragraph already mentions. Imho the paragraph should be in this or slightly modified form readded. -- 2.247.248.52 (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Just to respond to the issue about dw.com (I'll leave the rest of it to others to unwind): I'm not familiar with dw.com, but I'm inclined to agree that it looks like a high quality source. It's not listed at WP:PERENNIAL, but it is on an (apparently very old) Wikipedia list of good German sources: Wikipedia:News sources/Germany and favorably mentioned by WikiProject Germany: Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany/Portal:Bavaria/News. A quick scan of Wikipedia discussions involving the site over the years suggests it is viewed favorably by Wikipedians. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 17:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Help regarding translation
Hey there! I'm an admin of SqWiki and yesterday one of our members wanted to use CTT to translate this article but found out that he couldn't because it contained a link blocked as spam. Basically the website's link. I checked our Spam-blacklist page but I can't find the article's title on it. Any idea what might be happening? - Klein Muçi (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Klein Muçi: see Special:Permalink/945006664#Pornhub.com_links_at_Pornhub for the whitelisting request I made to add the links to this article. I think it's on a global blacklist (across all Wikimedia sites) and can be whitelisted locally. As a temporary solution, you could remove those references or just remove the "http(s)" part of the URL. — Bilorv (talk) 18:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: I see... So it is global. Thank you for your explanation! :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2020
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add a link of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines to the text "Philippines" in the second paragraph. Damaredayo (talk) 01:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you for the request. — Bilorv (talk) 01:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2020
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
203.189.116.128 (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nothing requested. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2020 (2)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
203.189.116.128 (talk) 13:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Nothing requested. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot
Is this picture allowed here? Isn't it showing things that some people really don't feel comfortable with and don't want to see even though they're looking for info about the website. Pwoli (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class Pornography articles
- High-importance Pornography articles
- C-Class High-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles