Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sandbox/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Woodstock2010 (talk | contribs) at 13:04, 9 January 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

RyGuy Sign Here! My Journal

Sakyasingha Panigrahi is an Interactive Advertising expert from India with great expertise in matters related to internet. He is currently working as the CEO of Aeon[[1]], an interactive agency based in Mumbai, India. He is very well known for his knowledge on interactive advertising, Search Engine Marketing, Viral Marketing and Business Intelligence.

Recently Mr.Panigrahi addressed Mumbai University students and professors on the subject of interactive advertising and predicted a great future for the industry in India. He spoke about how internet usage is growing in India and what kind of impact it is making on the advertising patterns of the country.

Ethical debates arise over the potential complications from circumcision which include; skin-tags, skin-bridges, unevenness, scarring, traumatic shock, seizures, blood flow and nerve development complications, and less often, death.[2] Another concern is the buildup of nerveless cells that grow on the glans of a circumcised penis, called [keratin], toughening the texture of the glans over time. [3]

Whether or not circumcision is justifiable is a matter of opinions, which greatly vary. Wikipedia defines surgery as the "medical specialty that treats diseases or injuries by operative manual and instrumental treatment". Since routine circumcision removes healthy foreskin, not injured or diseased foreskin, it is often incorrectly labeled as a surgical procedure. Logically and technically speaking, it can not be surgery. It is mutilation. That is why, internationally, such practices are referred to as male and female genital mutilation. Some doctors object to it, claiming that it is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath. [www.circumcision.org/ethics.htm] These doctors claim that removing a healthy normal body part, causing bleeding and unnecessary pain, contradicts the oath, "First do no harm." There are plenty of studies claiming that this pain has long-lasting effects and consequences. [www.circumcision.org/ethics.htm]

The human foreskin has twelve known functions, such as to contact the G Spot. [4] It is the opinion of some researchers that foreskin can be a tool for intercourse. In the book Sex as Nature Inteded It author Kristen O'Hara argues that foreskin is a natural gliding stimulator of the vaginal walls during intercourse, increasing a woman's overall clitoral stimulation and allowing for the achievement of female orgasm more often and in shorter periods of time. [5] It is therefore believed by some that the absence of the foreskin and gliding action makes it more difficult, not impossible, for a woman to achieve orgasm during intercourse.

Physicians and surgeons earn thousands of dollars per year, performing circumcisions. Some believe that there is a conspiracy behind medical circumcision and that the justifications keep changing rapidly as each theory is disproved over time. [6] Many believe that circumcision advocates are clinging to the new theories that circumcision can help prevent AIDS. However, Professor Valiere Alcena, MD of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine claims that most of the studies on AIDS and circumcision are controlled trials. He claims that from the start, they are intended to claim circumcision can prevent AIDS when other studies have claimed the exact opposite. Some studies even say that the consequences of circumcision can cause AIDS. [7] If this is true, then some of what you read about HIV and circumcision would be completely misleading disinformation. In western Europe, where men are not normally circumcised, AIDS is considered uncommon. However, in Africa, where hundreds of millions are circumcised, AIDS is rampant.[8]




Htest this is a test]