User talk:Stephan rostie: Difference between revisions
Slatersteven (talk | contribs) |
→March 2023: Reply |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:Is that a wikipedia policy or advice ? [[User:Stephan rostie|Stephan rostie]] ([[User talk:Stephan rostie#top|talk]]) 13:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC) |
:Is that a wikipedia policy or advice ? [[User:Stephan rostie|Stephan rostie]] ([[User talk:Stephan rostie#top|talk]]) 13:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Offical advice [[WP:REFACTOR]]. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 13:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC) |
::Offical advice [[WP:REFACTOR]]. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 13:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::Okay got it [[User:Stephan rostie|Stephan rostie]] ([[User talk:Stephan rostie#top|talk]]) 13:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:48, 19 March 2023
Hello, Stephan rostie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 07:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
March 2023
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I have no opinion on the content. I just happened to notice the reverting. Onorem (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, i got it. But please check @Horse Eye's Back because he started it by disturbing the article with no argument. Stephan rostie (talk) 23:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
You also need to read wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
You might also want to read wp:spa. Slatersteven (talk) 16:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
You also need to read WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Slatersteven (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC) You need to read wp:agf and wp:npa, to accuse users of disruption because you do not like their edits is not a good route to editing here. Slatersteven (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- No i am accusing them of disruptive editing because they ignored the consensus reached in the talks page between I and @Matt Smith (back when it was only I and him) without even bothering themselves to join or probably even see the talks. Stephan rostie (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- That is an assumption of bad faith, they are not required to accept your (or Matt Smith's reasons). Nor is silence agreement, they may have been waiting to see what you wrote (or (as I did) not even catch your talk page comment, as many users watch many pages, they do not concentrate on single articles or even topics). Also I am unsure MAtt agreed with you, as they say "The status of Taiwan (island) is still in dispute and is not internationally recognized as a part of China. Therefore, it's different from the other case you mentioned. ", I see no comment where they alter that view. So it may well be no one took part as they assumed Matts objection meant you would not assume you had consensus. In addition, there is a least one other objection (along the same lines) before you make your edit. Slatersteven (talk) 13:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
You should also not alter your posts, after they have been replied to. Slatersteven (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Is that a wikipedia policy or advice ? Stephan rostie (talk) 13:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Offical advice WP:REFACTOR. Slatersteven (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay got it Stephan rostie (talk) 13:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Offical advice WP:REFACTOR. Slatersteven (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)