Argument from fallacy: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 December 2023

15 November 2023

3 October 2023

16 March 2023

1 February 2023

19 October 2022

2 August 2022

26 June 2022

19 June 2022

21 October 2021

20 October 2021

13 August 2021

21 April 2021

3 April 2021

4 February 2021

2 January 2021

  • curprev 09:0209:02, 2 January 2021119.237.25.164 talk 6,373 bytes −402 Removed a sentence. It wasn't clear what the overall meaning of the sentence was, but the first half of the sentence contained the blatantly false "fallacious arguments cannot arrive at true conclusions." undo

29 December 2020

1 December 2020

12 August 2020

26 July 2020

  • curprev 14:3014:30, 26 July 2020Fallacy Finder talk contribs 6,660 bytes −472 →‎Form: The statement is patently false, perhaps owing to misuse of the word "arguments." Clearly, not all historical or philosophical arguments, great or not, are fallacious. Perhaps many, if not all, "great" historical/philosophical collections of arguments/essays contain fallacies, who knows. Such a thing would be impossible to verify. The quote muddied a concept that had been sufficiently explained in the preeceding passages. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 14:2014:20, 26 July 2020Fallacy Finder talk contribs 7,132 bytes −58 →‎Form: Language seemed to imply a contradiction undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 July 2020

9 July 2020

17 October 2019

20 June 2019

17 June 2019

6 June 2019

27 May 2019

22 May 2019

26 February 2019

23 January 2019

23 September 2018

30 June 2018

2 February 2018

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)