Cradle of Humankind: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

26 December 2023

29 November 2023

22 November 2023

3 November 2023

20 October 2023

17 September 2023

15 September 2023

18 July 2023

3 March 2023

20 February 2023

12 February 2023

30 January 2023

29 January 2023

24 January 2023

14 January 2023

9 January 2023

9 November 2022

10 October 2022

22 August 2022

2 July 2022

29 June 2022

9 June 2022

26 May 2022

19 May 2022

18 May 2022

  • curprev 22:3122:31, 18 May 2022Skllagyook talk contribs 17,822 bytes −4,375 This article is about a specific site in South Africa, not the idea generally of the origin of humans in Africa (which is current scientific consensus but that is not relevant here). undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 20:5920:59, 18 May 2022Rdano001 talk contribs 22,197 bytes +4,375 Added two new sections 1."History of the Title “Cradle of Humankind” 2. Controversy/Politics Surrounding Africa as the “Cradle of Humankind”. 1 discusses the different continents that have been suggested to receive the Cradle of Humankind title and some examples of people who have contributed to these arguments. 2 discusses some of the political controversy surrounding South Africa receiving the title "Cradle of Humankind" . I added a citation for the geological context section. undo Tags: Reverted nowiki added Visual edit

12 May 2022

11 May 2022

9 May 2022

7 May 2022

  • curprev 13:5613:56, 7 May 2022165.73.58.137 talk 18,056 bytes −1,123 The logic for restoring this section is beyond flawed, the South African sites have much more credibility than the Kenyan ones. By continuing to leave this section you are deliberately misleading. If you you had any sense of academic and scientific reasoning you would leave it out. At the bare minimum it should be stated as a mere theory and one that is disputed by most of the world's top paleontologists. Further more this "theory" has only gained traction because it is part of a smear campai... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 May 2022

3 May 2022

  • curprev 18:0618:06, 3 May 2022165.73.58.137 talk 18,055 bytes −1,124 Removed disputed content. There is no modern scientific consensus that there is a definitive cradle of humankind. There is strong evidence in both South Africa and Kenya. However it should be noted far more fossils have been found at the South African site than the Kenyan one and that many of these fossils are of far greater significance than those found in Kenya. undo Tag: Reverted

26 April 2022

19 April 2022

22 March 2022

11 March 2022

10 March 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)