Talk:Ozy Media: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:21, 7 October 2021

Articles for creation B‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted on 5 September 2014 by reviewer Kvng (talk · contribs).

California B‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Websites: Computing B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

OZY logo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fastest Growing YouTube Talk Show Claim

The wiki article includes a claim attributed to Good Morning America that Ozy is the fastest growing YouTube talk show in history.

However, the NYT article posted on 9/26 states that the “fastest-growing” claim was in fact made by Ozy’s Watson on Good Morning America.

Thus, I propose the attribution of the claim to Good Morning America be removed and the sentence rewritten to clarify the claim was made by Ozy themselves. DietDrPhil (talk) 07:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be reasonable to just delete it entirely. That could apply to large tracts of this article which has clearly been authored by the company itself for self-promotion. Given the demonstrated mendacity of the company's principles I think we should feel free to Be Bold. Goatsnstoats (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 October 2021

It has been proposed in this section that Ozy Media be renamed and moved to Ozy (media company).

A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

OZY (media company) → Ozy (media company) – Per WP:TITLETM, style an all-caps company name in title case White 720 (talk) 01:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support the 2nd ref appears to mainly use "Ozy" in prose. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support not an acronym Oh Zee Why. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support - Common name. Schierbecker (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I've usually seen this as "Ozy" in MSM sources — MaxEnt 22:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per this New York Times article, "Ozy was named after 'Ozymandias,' the famous sonnet by Shelley" so it isn't an acronym. Trivialist (talk) 12:52, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Novellasyes (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Oppose There are also articles about the firm in which the name is spelled in all caps: OZY (example). I suggest that the NYTimes doing otherwise has more to with their archaic internal manual of style than anything else. Moreover, the company itself spells it in all caps (verify). WP:TITLETM notwithstanding, are we Wikipedians becoming so arrogant and presumptuous that we are now telling companies how to spell their own name?! What’s next? Tell Kraft Foods they have to change their name to Craft Foods because we editors at Wikipedia deem it so?<soapbox/> Thanks! — Spike Toronto 16:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty much all media I've seen covering the controversy does it in lower caps. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - It is true that the company calls itself OZY^[1] both in titles and in prose. Calling them "Ozy" is a type of deadnaming and shows a lack of respect for self-identification. Many media articles, such as the one cited by User:SpikeToronto above correctly spell "OZY". Just because a bunch of articles all of the sudden followed the NYT in exposing the con (while saying that they suspected it all along but without having the balls to do so), and followed the NYT's styling of "Ozy," does not mean it is not OZY. XavierItzm (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.ozy.com/pg/about-us/

[1] ttps://www.ozy.com/pg/about-us/

[1]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 *'''Strongly Oppose''' There are also articles about the firm in which the name is spelled in all caps: OZY (<span class="plainlinks">[https://www.axios.com/ozy-revenue-profitability-carlos-watson-cdd726df-2e3d-49d7-abad-7ac6036f7013.html '''example''']</span>). I suggest that the NYTimes doing otherwise has more to with their archaic internal manual of style than anything else. Moreover, the company itself spells it in all caps (<span class="plainlinks">[https://www.ozy.com/pg/about-us/ '''verify''']</span>). [[WP:TITLETM]] notwithstanding, are we Wikipedians becoming so arrogant and presumptuous that we are now telling companies how to spell their own name?! What’s next? Tell Kraft Foods they have to change their name to Craft Foods because we editors at Wikipedia deem it so?<code><nowiki><soapbox/></nowiki></code> Thanks!{{smiley}} — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 16:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' Pretty much all media I've seen covering the controversy does it in lower caps. [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 18:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
+* '''Oppose''' - It is true that the company calls itself OZY<ref>https://www.ozy.com/pg/about-us/</ref> both in titles and in prose.  Calling them "Ozy" is a type of deadnaming and shows a lack of respect for self-identification.  Many media articles, such as the one cited by [[User:SpikeToronto]] above correctly spell "OZY".  Just because a bunch of articles all of the sudden followed the NYT in exposing the con (while saying that they suspected it all along but without having the balls to do so), and followed the NYT's styling of "Ozy," does not mean it is not OZY. [[User:XavierItzm|XavierItzm]] ([[User talk:XavierItzm|talk]]) 14:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)