Talk:AMIA bombing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 151: Line 151:
::Suspected perpetrator is already inside infobox, although it is not certain was bomber Berro or not. Field "perpetrator" stands for clear responsibility for the criminal attack, not for speculations, accusations and suspicions. Officially, the case is unsolved and ongoing. There are numerous sources which state contrary to your claims, and also about foreign pressures, changes in charges during the presidency of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, and so on. --[[User:MehrdadFR|MehrdadFR]] ([[User talk:MehrdadFR|talk]]) 19:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
::Suspected perpetrator is already inside infobox, although it is not certain was bomber Berro or not. Field "perpetrator" stands for clear responsibility for the criminal attack, not for speculations, accusations and suspicions. Officially, the case is unsolved and ongoing. There are numerous sources which state contrary to your claims, and also about foreign pressures, changes in charges during the presidency of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, and so on. --[[User:MehrdadFR|MehrdadFR]] ([[User talk:MehrdadFR|talk]]) 19:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
::: Academic consensus is Hezbollah involvement, as does Nisman's investigation. Kirchner's political manueavering years after the attack, have little relevance - they are relevant to her article or to Argentina's various law and order articles. The status of the case, in a country such as Argentina, has little bearing on anything.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 19:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
::: Academic consensus is Hezbollah involvement, as does Nisman's investigation. Kirchner's political manueavering years after the attack, have little relevance - they are relevant to her article or to Argentina's various law and order articles. The status of the case, in a country such as Argentina, has little bearing on anything.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 19:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
::::Do not lie, it is not. As I said Levitt is writer and member of lobbyist group WINEP, not any kind of reputable academic. Nisman's charges based on misinformation by one pity MEK member has been dismissed years ago, today it's relevant only to biographical article about him, legal it's a past. You're manipulating, that's oblivious, sticking to past and some fringe figures of zero importance. Please keep in mind Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not outlet of a Jewish state. --[[User:MehrdadFR|MehrdadFR]] ([[User talk:MehrdadFR|talk]]) 20:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:14, 16 September 2017

BBC Article

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6089788.stm In case anyone feels like integrating it, some good stuff.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.103.11 (talk) 23:39, 26 October 2006‎ (UTC)[reply]

POV

Respectfully to all involved in this article, I think the word martyrdom (about the suicide bomber) is POV. For this reason, I've put that word in quotation marks.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngcb (talkcontribs) 19:57, 18 July 2007‎ (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Part of South Lebanon conflict (1982–2000)?

The infobox states that this article/event is part of the South Lebanon conflict (1982–2000). I don't think it is appropriated because it assumes that the attack has its origins in the Lebanon conflict; while the reasons behind the attack are -to my humble opinion- far from clear.

I would like to read your opinions before removing it.

Fernando A. Gimenez (talk) 16:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


New info in July 2013

It is reported that the former interior minister of Argentina, a Jewish fellow named Carlos Vladimir Corach, is being investigated for his ties to the bombing. Seems he paid $400,000 to one of the bombers. I'll leave it to the WikiGatekeepers to decide whether or not to report this terribly unfashionable development. There's more info on the Jewish Telegraph's site. http://www.jta.org/2013/06/30/news-opinion/world/jewish-ex-argentina-govt-official-to-be-probed-in-amia-bombing 38.115.185.4 (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC)HelenChicago[reply]

Just a correction. Corach didn't pay to "one of the bombers". He supposedly paid $400.000 to Telleldín, the car dealer who allegedly sold the car which ended up being used for the attack. --Fernando A. Gimenez (talk) 17:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Would it be relevantly important to make a mention in the main article regarding Carlos Vladimir Corach's Jewish background? Because should the 400K payment be proven, this blows this case wide open to the suggestion that this was a Mossad "false flag" event... Please advise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.172.43 (talk) 21:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.nowpublic.com/world/argentine-judge-links-ex-president-menem-amia-bombing
    Triggered by \bnowpublic\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 00:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 03:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AMIA bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AMIA bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AMIA bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous claims by lobbyists

Claim that Hezbollah claimed responsibility is absolute nonsense, since they denied any involvement and condemned the attack, and inserting book by Matthew Levitt as a reference is a balant POV itself because he comes from Israeli lobbyist group WINEP. --MehrdadFR (talk) 17:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Hezbollah involvement, via their proxy at the time Ansar Allah, is well sourced.Icewhiz (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Suspected perpetrator is already inside infobox, although it is not certain was bomber Berro or not. Field "perpetrator" stands for clear responsibility for the criminal attack, not for speculations, accusations and suspicions. Officially, the case is unsolved and ongoing. There are numerous sources which state contrary to your claims, and also about foreign pressures, changes in charges during the presidency of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, and so on. --MehrdadFR (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Academic consensus is Hezbollah involvement, as does Nisman's investigation. Kirchner's political manueavering years after the attack, have little relevance - they are relevant to her article or to Argentina's various law and order articles. The status of the case, in a country such as Argentina, has little bearing on anything.Icewhiz (talk) 19:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do not lie, it is not. As I said Levitt is writer and member of lobbyist group WINEP, not any kind of reputable academic. Nisman's charges based on misinformation by one pity MEK member has been dismissed years ago, today it's relevant only to biographical article about him, legal it's a past. You're manipulating, that's oblivious, sticking to past and some fringe figures of zero importance. Please keep in mind Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not outlet of a Jewish state. --MehrdadFR (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]