Talk:Acceptance: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


More applications are needed alongside Buddhism. Meditation, Islam, other faiths...?
More applications are needed alongside Buddhism. Meditation, Islam, other faiths...?

The note on Buddhists accepting Buddha as a higher being is plain wrong. I'm removing this. 2.18.10


Re Minorities: "on equal terms in all aspects of" adds nothing to "full participation."
Re Minorities: "on equal terms in all aspects of" adds nothing to "full participation."

Revision as of 21:35, 18 February 2010

WikiProject iconPsychology Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

OLD: Acceptance is a cognitive activity or state that is the opposite of resistance.

It's only the spiritual/psychology sense that's being dealt with here.

I think "activity or state" is good, but it's not much help defining one vague, tricky term as the opposite of another. I feel the antonymic sense of resistance should be noted with reservations.

I deleted the paragraph contrasting acceptance with approval, sympathy, liking , tolerance , and affinity. Of these, I think only tolerance is worth the space, but the deleted text did little to distinguish among these senses. Perhaps also surrender and resignation could be included in a discussion of overlapping terms?

More applications are needed alongside Buddhism. Meditation, Islam, other faiths...?

The note on Buddhists accepting Buddha as a higher being is plain wrong. I'm removing this. 2.18.10

Re Minorities: "on equal terms in all aspects of" adds nothing to "full participation."

WRT the last comment above...

...does anyone else find the last paragraph in this articel suspicious? It sounds strange to me... 68.39.174.238 17:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting that no mention of forgiveness as related to acceptance is offered as either an associated emotion, or as an associated meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.201.224.2 (talk) 20:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something seems off about the "grief acceptance" section...