This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
I have changed Austrian-Russian victory to "Russo-Austrian vicotry" since the Russians accounted for 41,000 troops on the field (the Austrians had 18,500 troops, mostly in reserve). Although there are claims that Loudon's participation was instrumental to the victory, the Austrians accounted for only ca. 30% of the allied army, and the overall command was Saltykov's. When Loudon faced Frederick II by himself, he was soundly beaten at Liegnitz in 1760. Vitoldus44 18:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info box
Info box is overly detailed and confusing this defeats the purpose of the info box which is to give the gist at a glance. Much of that information should be moved into the body of the article and ref'd as it does not agree with what's currently written in article.Tttom1 (talk) 17:16, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
41,000 Russians and 24,000 Austrians "respectively"
No need to cite the info in the infobox because it is just a representation of already cited data in the prose this is a debatable change, and I'll leave it this way until the MH standard changes.
Section 1;
Frankfurt an der Oder; in lead it is "Frankfurt (Oder)", be consistent fixed
Section 2;
suited itself well to defense; is a bit awkward and confusing, reword fixed
south-west, north east, south east, south-east; be consistent, use hyphenation or just leave it. Fix through the article fixed
Why italics for "all" in "that all the Allies"? Frederick thought that he would face a few, not all emphasis
army around to the south east This way; a full stop after "south east" fixed
rank or title of Friedrich Wilhelm von Seydlitz?fixed
Cossacks is over linkedfixed
last-ditch effort; it is not a standard dictionary word, better use general wording Merriam webster, Cambridge, Columbia, and in thesauruses.
led an Austrian and Russian horse counter-attack; this is a bit confusing, did he uses horses to counter or what? make it clearer ok, but general use for cavalry is "horse"
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Russian before the battle was 41.248 people and the Austrians - 18.523. These figures are in the documents and in all Russian scientific works. Why do you ignore this data and use German invention? 91.188.184.57 (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]