Talk:Christianization of Scandinavia: Difference between revisions
B |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Immaculate conception?!== |
==Immaculate conception?!== |
||
The immaculate conception is a doctrine that wasn't developed until the 1800s. Surely whoever wrote this article is referring to the incarnation. [[User:Pinksisket|Pinksisket]] 23:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC) |
The immaculate conception is a doctrine that wasn't developed until the 1800s. Surely whoever wrote this article is referring to the incarnation. [[User:Pinksisket|Pinksisket]] 23:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Temple at Uppsala== |
|||
I move two sentences here for discussion: |
|||
:''By 2001, the existence of this temple had not been confirmed by archaeological findings.<ref>Kaufhold 2001, 86</ref> Whether the remains of several large wooden constructions, found by excavations under the present church, are from a pagan temple or from an earlier church build in the same place, is disputed.'' |
|||
The presence of this text is problematic because it does appear a bit off-topic and misleading in the context. No one disputes that the area was used for pagan sacrifices, and AFAIK extremely little of the area has even been excavated: a small area under the church, the foundation of the royal mead hall and the centre of two barrows. The text that I have removed makes it sound as if 1) the area has been thoroughly excavated and 2) the presence of pagan worship is disputed, none of which is true.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig|talk]]) 10:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:16, 22 February 2009
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immaculate conception?!
The immaculate conception is a doctrine that wasn't developed until the 1800s. Surely whoever wrote this article is referring to the incarnation. Pinksisket 23:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Temple at Uppsala
I move two sentences here for discussion:
- By 2001, the existence of this temple had not been confirmed by archaeological findings.[1] Whether the remains of several large wooden constructions, found by excavations under the present church, are from a pagan temple or from an earlier church build in the same place, is disputed.
The presence of this text is problematic because it does appear a bit off-topic and misleading in the context. No one disputes that the area was used for pagan sacrifices, and AFAIK extremely little of the area has even been excavated: a small area under the church, the foundation of the royal mead hall and the centre of two barrows. The text that I have removed makes it sound as if 1) the area has been thoroughly excavated and 2) the presence of pagan worship is disputed, none of which is true.--Berig (talk) 10:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- ^ Kaufhold 2001, 86
- Unassessed Religion articles
- Unknown-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Norse history and culture articles
- Top-importance Norse history and culture articles
- B-Class Denmark articles
- Mid-importance Denmark articles
- All WikiProject Denmark pages
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class Norway articles
- WikiProject Norway articles
- B-Class Middle Ages articles
- Top-importance Middle Ages articles
- B-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- B-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles