Talk:FairTax: Difference between revisions
Brianyoumans (talk | contribs) rewrite? |
→Rewrite?: thoughts |
||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
==Rewrite?== |
==Rewrite?== |
||
It may be time to rewrite parts of this article in, well, past tense. Public interest in and support for the plan appears to be dropping off, perhaps with the decline of the Tea Party movement.[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] ([[User talk:Brianyoumans|talk]]) 19:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
It may be time to rewrite parts of this article in, well, past tense. Public interest in and support for the plan appears to be dropping off, perhaps with the decline of the Tea Party movement.[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] ([[User talk:Brianyoumans|talk]]) 19:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
:Probably so - things like "In recent years" could give the wrong impression to the reader where a year would be clear. [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]] <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>12:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)</i></small> |
Revision as of 12:12, 20 February 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FairTax article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FairTax article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
FairTax is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 15, 2008. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Tagging
Various tags were recently added to the article and I'd like to discuss placement / removal. It is usually better to address such issues on the talk page before we jump to the last resort of tagging in article space, particularly for one that's been heavily debated, reviewed and stable for years. I haven't followed this topic for quite some time, so maybe there is new information or studies that I'm unaware of that should be reflected in the article. If so, let's discuss it. Currently though, I don't see a new consensus on these issues or discussion with examples of each problem area. If nothing significant is discussed, we should consider it a well intentioned drive-by and remove it. We can continue to address issues on the talk. A decent review should also be done when sources are removed for attributed material. One recent source removed wasn't an op-ed as described in the summary - it was a debate hosted by the think tank that included economists that studied the plan. It was neither pro nor con and sourced both proponent and opponent viewpoints. I don't think the content or source material was reviewed - the removal appeared to be solely on the basis of being a free market source. Morphh (talk) 20:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously? This article reads like tea party erotic fan fiction. Do feel free to clean it up by removing the far-right think tanks and adding robust discussion in independent (i.e. not libertarian fundamentalist house journal) scholarly sources. Guy (Help!) 22:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously is also what I'm thinking. The tea party wasn't even around when this article was written and Von Mises called it a fraud. Look, I get it - I help clean up the economics project when it was being overrun with Austrian economics and nonsensical information. So I'm well aware of the ref-spamming and am not opposed to your cause, but not every article needs the machete approach. Happy to remove think tank sources if they're used improperly or there are better sources that represent the viewpoint within the scope of the article. But removal needs to be consistent with policy - the sources included likely represent significant topic viewpoints or research done on the plan. I'm not aware of any new research or the robust discussion you're referring, so if you could please provide links to the independent scholarly sources are you speaking of and provide some specific examples and evidence, we can discuss it properly. If we can't come to agreement, we can hold an RFC on the topic or FAR of the article. Morphh (talk) 14:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Having had this article on my watch list for many years, I am reluctantly forced to agree with Morphh. Most of the research on this has been done by conservative economists who are favorable to the idea. Others have basically ignored it. I think we have as much balance here as we can get. Improvements are welcome. Brianyoumans (talk) 00:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on FairTax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108065724/http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/MacroeconomicAnalysisofFairTax.pdf to http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/MacroeconomicAnalysisofFairTax.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/22815.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://linderfairtax.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=18
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://people.bu.edu/kotlikoff/FairTax%20NTJ%20Final%20Version%2C%20April%2024%2C%202007.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=view&id=4429
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/Excerpts_from_response_to_tax_panel-103006.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on FairTax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150205000339/http://woodall.house.gov/issue/fairtax to http://woodall.house.gov/issue/fairtax
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015083330/http://fairtax.org/PDF/Open_Letter.pdf to http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/Open_Letter.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070614190649/http://www.beaconhill.org/FairTax2006/TaxingSalesundertheFairTaxWhatRateWorks061005.pdf to http://www.beaconhill.org/FairTax2006/TaxingSalesundertheFairTaxWhatRateWorks061005.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070614190708/http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/GaleRebuttal.pdf to http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/GaleRebuttal.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070614190659/http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/JCTRebuttal.pdf to http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/JCTRebuttal.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080702215915/http://www.bakerinstitute.org/publications/ImpactofHR25-TEPP.pdf to http://www.bakerinstitute.org/publications/ImpactofHR25-TEPP.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071102141450/http://www3.brookings.edu/papers/1998/03taxes_gale.aspx to http://www.brookings.edu/papers/1998/03taxes_gale.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050613180711/http://www.brookings.edu/views/articles/gale/20050516.pdf to http://www.brookings.edu/views/articles/gale/20050516.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071110010854/http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=31824 to http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=31824
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150205000339/http://woodall.house.gov/issue/fairtax to http://woodall.house.gov/issue/fairtax
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on FairTax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831050128/http://boortz.com/nuze/200509/09202005.html to http://boortz.com/nuze/200509/09202005.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on FairTax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060826180702/http://boortz.com/nuze/200509/09152005.html to http://boortz.com/nuze/200509/09152005.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203173646/http://boortz.com/nuze/200605/05252006.html to http://boortz.com/nuze/200605/05252006.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Rewrite?
It may be time to rewrite parts of this article in, well, past tense. Public interest in and support for the plan appears to be dropping off, perhaps with the decline of the Tea Party movement.Brianyoumans (talk) 19:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- FA-Class Accounting articles
- Accounting articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- FA-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- FA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- FA-Class American politics articles
- High-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- FA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- FA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics