This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Partygate fine
She has been reported as having received a fine. Therefore it’s entirely legitimate to include that information in the article. Star-one (talk) 06:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's reported in the cited source as a 'claim', so not as a fact. WP:BLP needs to be closely followed, as does WP:CATVER. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's reported in the sources as a 'claim', so not as a fact. WP:BLPREMOVE is clear that it should be removed, so I have removed it. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If it was reported in some partisan blog like The Canary of Guido Fawkes you’d have a point. But it’s being reported by the Daily Telegraph and the BBC, two reputable news organisations who would not report such a thing unless they had verified its authenticity. Therefore it’s ‘good enough’ as reasonably factual to stay. Star-one (talk) 07:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't convey what was reported though, which was the cause of the problem. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Personal life
Where are the routine details about her date of birth etc?JRPG (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
