Talk:Nathan Bedford Forrest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ubikwit (talk | contribs) at 19:29, 30 June 2016 (→‎Freemasonry: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bias

You can't fault pro-Forrest websites for being biased and then fill the article with suggestions that he was an irredeemable racist and only cite sources which have a clear and obvious bias AGAINST Forrest. It is not for Wikipedia to pay historical figures back over perceived sins which do not have strong historical support. If you want this to remain "Wikipinion" or "Wikigossip" keep doing this kind of thing...I don't think it's credible in the shape that this site is in to suggest that this is any kind of credible encyclopedia...I wonder if this entire think is a help or hindrance based on how many rumors and outright lies are passed off to millions as fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.158.55 (talkcontribs)

Terrorist

Nathan Bedford Forest WAS the first "Grand Wizard" of the Klu Klux Klan. I do not see this man's reputation and legacy as anything but the head of this country's first terrorist organization.shyjayb 09:09, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

There is no proof to your statement whatsoever. I for one would like to see you provide documentation to validate your claim. The article and statements attributed to him (1868) were quickly and repeatedly refuted by Forrest himself shortly after the Cincinnati article and for years afterward. No credible witness has ever been documented proving his membership, let alone as the 'First' Grand Wizard or leader of any kind. Both the reporter for the paper, who fabricated statements, and the then Governor and later Senator from Tennessee, William Brownlow lied in print. Brownlow lied and distorted the record repeatedly, both in the Senate and through his newspaper. He was so radicalized and corrupt that a 1982 survey of 50 Tennessee historians voted him the worst Governor in the States history. He also is one of the most hated men in the States history. I implore you to research the newspapers of the time (1865-1872 for starters) as well as the Congressional records concerning the Select Committee hearings into the Klan. It is unfortunate that so many figures or events in our history have been so corrupted by hate and bias that ignorance has become truly, bliss. JMP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.22.255.178 (talk) 22:46, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Ku Klux Klan was America's VERY first domestic terrorist organization, and Nathan Bedford Forrest WAS their VERY first Grand Wizard. What about this point in factual history do you NOT understand???shyjayb 06:48, 29 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyjayb (talkcontribs)

Blacklisted Links Found on Nathan Bedford Forrest

Cyberbot II has detected links on Nathan Bedford Forrest which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.change.org/petitions/selma-city-council-no-more-monuments-to-kkk-hate
    Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Nathan Bedford Forrest

Cyberbot II has detected links on Nathan Bedford Forrest which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.change.org/petitions/selma-city-council-no-more-monuments-to-kkk-hate
    Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TERRORIST

That's what the man WAS, period and pistol point BLANK! Cyberbot THIS, white-list/black-list THAT; Vox populi, vox Humbug! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyjayb (talkcontribs) 09:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC) lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.99.178.23 (talk) 20:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A source

Here is a source about Nathan Bedford. http://www.civilwarhome.com/forrestcampaigns.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vexthesmol (talkcontribs) 19:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Freemasonry

Why is there no mention of this connection?--Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 19:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]