Talk:Reason (magazine): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m removing a very old comment that violates WP:FORUM and manually moving an undated and unsigned comment to the archive
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 20: Line 20:
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Zach Weissmueller]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Zach Weissmueller]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 17:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Zach Weissmueller]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Zach Weissmueller]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 17:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

== Chicago Tribune best magazine is not notable ==

The "criteria" that unnamed Chicago Tribune staff members used to determine "best magazine" was not a literary, scientific, educational, or information-based standard. It was merely that a Chicago Tribune staff member paid money for the magazine then put it in the staff members backpack or in their bathroom or coffee table. That is not of any significance. [[User:MBUSHIstory|MBUSHIstory]] ([[User talk:MBUSHIstory|talk]]) 23:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:02, 10 April 2023

Template:Vital article

"Zach Weissmueller" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Zach Weissmueller and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Zach Weissmueller until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Tribune best magazine is not notable

The "criteria" that unnamed Chicago Tribune staff members used to determine "best magazine" was not a literary, scientific, educational, or information-based standard. It was merely that a Chicago Tribune staff member paid money for the magazine then put it in the staff members backpack or in their bathroom or coffee table. That is not of any significance. MBUSHIstory (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]