Talk:Reason (magazine): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 28: Line 28:


::"Tempo chose a simpler route: What we like. We picked out magazines that you'll find on staffers' nightstands and coffee tables, in our backpacks and on our car seats and on the edges of our bathtubs. These are the periodicals for which we pay good money."
::"Tempo chose a simpler route: What we like. We picked out magazines that you'll find on staffers' nightstands and coffee tables, in our backpacks and on our car seats and on the edges of our bathtubs. These are the periodicals for which we pay good money."

== I am removing self-sources self-promotions ==

A magazine cannot be a source for an article on itself, especially self-promotional material. Removing all sentences without sourcing or sources by Reason magazine. These are no more than advertising. [[User:MBUSHIstory|MBUSHIstory]] ([[User talk:MBUSHIstory|talk]]) 23:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:14, 10 April 2023

Template:Vital article

"Zach Weissmueller" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Zach Weissmueller and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Zach Weissmueller until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Tribune best magazine is not notable

The "criteria" that unnamed Chicago Tribune staff members used to determine "best magazine" was not a literary, scientific, educational, or information-based standard. It was merely that a Chicago Tribune staff member paid money for the magazine then put it in the staff members backpack or in their bathroom or coffee table. That is not of any significance.

"Not so long ago, the National Magazine Awards honored a pack of familiar favorites such as The Atlantic Monthly and The New Yorker, offering elaborately eloquent justifications for having so anointed those august publications.
"Tempo chose a simpler route: What we like. We picked out magazines that you'll find on staffers' nightstands and coffee tables, in our backpacks and on our car seats and on the edges of our bathtubs. These are the periodicals for which we pay good money."

I am removing self-sources self-promotions

A magazine cannot be a source for an article on itself, especially self-promotional material. Removing all sentences without sourcing or sources by Reason magazine. These are no more than advertising. MBUSHIstory (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]