This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
– Now that we have Thomas Mair (murderer), there is no longer a primary topic for "Thomas Mair", so the DAB page should reside at Thomas Mair and the article for the 18th Century minister should be at Thomas Mair (minister). (PS The murderer is obviously heavily featured in the news at the moment but I cannot believe that he will have such long term notability to justify being treated as the primary topic.) MrStoofer (talk) 15:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - why not? That's what we did with Oliver Burke. Unreal7 (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you are actually against the proposal. I think you are in favour of the first part but also in favour of a move for Thomas Mair (murderer), which is a separate issue.--MrStoofer (talk) 11:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just because we have another article, doesn't mean minister is no longer WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. What evidence is there that they are of roughly equal notability? The murderer is WP:RECENT, but the minister is being written about three centuries later. Boleyn (talk) 12:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The minister does not appear to be a major figure and would likely be obscure to most readers, while the more well-known murderer would meet the page views criteria of the primary topic guidelines but not the significance one. Seems like a good case for disambiguation. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 16:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
