Template talk:Infobox bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hamtechperson (talk | contribs) at 20:13, 20 December 2023 (→‎Template-protected edit request on 20 December 2023: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconInfoboxes
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconBridges and Tunnels Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Complete

At this moment Category:Pages using infobox bridge with unknown parameters is emptyNaraht (talk) 04:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done. Thanks for this gnoming. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

refs=

No documentation in the article about the usage of refs=, so assuming a standard ref and cite template would work in the field. The template validates but doesnt show the reference. Referring to Frank J. Wood Bridge Jake-jakubowski (talk) 19:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I may be wrong, but I think giving references for data in infoboxes is largely deprecated these days. It is better to provide the reference for the fact in the body of the article. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, thank you! Jake-jakubowski (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 18 February 2023

Change | label59 = Electrified to link to Railway electrification --- Tbf69 P • T 10:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not edited in accord with WP:NOTBROKEN editing guideline. Thank you very much for your contributions! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 16:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The request was a cleanup from a move, hence isn't limited by WP:NOTBROKEN. --- Tbf69 P • T 17:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch and thanks for the reminder (WP:DOFIXIT) – and  edited. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 18:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --- Tbf69 P • T 18:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
my pleasure! Paine  18:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 4 September 2023

Change label41 "Clearance above" link from Structure gauge to Clearance above (change Clearance above to just Clearance above). It is a more direct topic than the current link which is a rail specific application. Z22 (talk) 23:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 14:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 20 December 2023

In the caption line, the template includes <big>Big text</big>, such that the text "Big text" appears uselessly at the end of the image caption for each instance of the infobox. Please fix by removing the extra wikicode. Hamtechperson 20:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]