User talk:Daedalus969

2:36 pm, 21 May 2024 (PDT)

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps: Use a descriptive subject/headline Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date Please also note that I have a problem with dropping things, but I am working on it, and have made progress. If you are going to use {{talkback}} templates, date them, so they can be archived properly. Click here to leave me a message

Re: Just thought you should know

The IP's a public one, belonging to a library. It seems pretty unlikely that the banned user in question was the person actually at the library computer at the time, and the request was an entirely reasonable one anyway. Just because a shared IP that can be used by a huge range of people has been used by a particular banned user, doesn't tar everyone else who uses that library with the same brush... (Of course, it's still necessary to look at the edit in question to see if it's disruptive, etc.) --ais523 20:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Nuts, crazy, nonsense, insane...

Hello, I have replied to your message at User talk:Retro00064#Nuts, crazy, nonsense, insane..., in case you are interested. Regards. [|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 00:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

• News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief

• In the news: Faulty story urges for advertising on Wikipedia; brief news

• Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland

• Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: Majestic Titans

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Response

I have zero interest in pursuing this further, but as a conscientious editor I'm obliged to tell you I responded to your comments on my talk page. Please consider wikipedia policies and the best interest of the project in general before continuing down this path. Thanks! Kuguar03 (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kuguar03 (talk) 00:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Koch

Why did you remove the tags? I justified them on the talk page. Multiple editors agreed with me. ANI said they shouldn't be removed. DF certainly shouldn't be removing them, especially when he never responded to my talk-page concern. THF (talk) 03:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus^{+ Contribs} 03:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daedalus969 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

The guy files an SPI and then gets put in the stocks for a week good. There's a moral there someplace. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Smirnoff

"...page blocks you!" That's a good one. Can I use it? :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 19:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page; other than that, feel free to! :D — Dædαlus^{+ Contribs} 20:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. An excellent addition to my collection of obscure quotes. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Talkback in case you aren't watching my page :)

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Mann jess's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jess_talk|_edits 21:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

What do do?

I'm wondering if you would be willing to offer an opinion on this. It really puzzles me... the user most involved in those articles is trying to establish notability by sources such as [1] [2] [3]. He has a good point that the show has aired around the world. Yet, does that fact alone establish notability? Does it offer enough third party sources to make an article? BE——Critical_{__Talk} 06:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Re the interaction ban between Mbz1 and yourself

Could you link / tell me what brought that about initially? un☯mi 22:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus^{+ Contribs} 22:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Unomi's talk page.
Message added 22:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

OR on JR

I saw you say you like to look at OR problems. Would you mind taking a gander at possible OR on JR? --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 06:36, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Letting me know...

Well, actually whenever I say things in edit summaries I kind of expect them to be rhetorical questions, but thanks for the heads-up. Have a good holiday season, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:32, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

From the super-double covert files of the Wiki-police type guy...

You're a gosh-darned whackjob. I just looked at your edit war with some obvious joker over the Rock Lobster/family guy thing, and it made my mind up about whether or not to donate to Wikipedia. I love the wikipedia concept, but when you're an example of the typical user, I'm sad to say that I just can't believe in it. That you resorted to every conceivable argument to keep a well-attested fact out of a pop-culture page is just pathetic. Do you care so much about the song that the mere mention of its use in a stupid show like Family Guy requires you to spend hours and hours trying to keep that information off the wikipedia page?

I hope your fingers all fall off so you have to find something better to do than edit wiki pages.