User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise

Archives
– July 2006 – October 2006 – November 2006 – January 2007 – 12 March 2007 – 5 May 2007 – 8 Sept 2007 – Dec 2007 – Feb 2008 – March 2008 – 12 May 2008 –

Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here

Greece and Epirus, Kosovo Vandalism

I had written some real facts about Greece, Epirus and Kosovo.

Greece facts proven by BBC and CNN reports. Epirus facts true from many years, reported by historian and discovered in a research in 2005. Kosovo is INCORRECTLY spelled, since It's populated with Albanians, it IS THE RIGHT OF ALBANIANS TO NAME IT, and it's real name is KosovA!

I'm very dissappointed with your service, you are unable to verify real facts and just remove what you think not true, I want to contribute but in this circumstances it is IMPOSSIBLE!

AND THIS http://my.telegraph.co.uk/f_off_telegraph_censors/may_2008/country_list_of_most_homosexuals_born_live.htm IS A SERIOUS TELEGRAPH! HOW THE HELL YOU KNOW THAT IT ISN'T? GO GET A LIFE, MAN!

Criticism

I am really having problem with vandals and your criticism. see this Rjecina

Image deleted despite IfD consensus to keep

The image 'Image:FotD 007x.jpg' was deleted despite a 2:1 consensus to keep. I am looking at a list of Nv8200p (talk · contribs) recent deletions, and he seems a bit too happy with the delete option. Maybe you could step in, reinstate the image and talk to the fellow admin? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 04:19, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, first of all, IfD is not a vote, numerical majority is not what counts, closing admins have quite a bit of freedom in weighting arguments according to their understanding of policy. Incidentally, it wasn't 2:1 either, it was 2:2. Fasach Nua and me against you and Sceptre, with Sceptre essentially providing no argument at all, giving a "speedy keep" vote that was blatantly out of policy and with no justification whatsoever other than the vague assertion that Fasach's nomination was "disruptive", leaving you as basically the only voice against deletion. You can of course take it to WP:DRV, but I don't really see much of a case. (And of course, I was for deletion anyway.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Check this out

We have a new user who is irredentist (klick for more details), and he has a lot of pictures (selfmade) like this and this and this and this and this and this and the Foto of the Day. He make a jokes of Tito and the Macedonians. Gruss Got --Raso mk (talk) 19:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:National flag of Germany 1933-1935.svg

Ok, how about this one: Image:National flag of Germany 1933-1935.svg was released into the public domain by its author, User:R-41. I understand that he drew the flag using the info at http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/de1933.html (and I'm sure the flag is in the PD), but he is certainly not the copyright holder. What now? :) --iNkubusse^? 21:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Noonien Soong

Please take a look: 77.78.200.160, especially this one: [1]. Zenanarh (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Lradrama (talk · contribs) has been helping me out with this guy for a while. BalkanFever 12:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Dodona apology

Dodona is back , in fact i have been around , i came to apologias specially to you because i feel guilty somehow truly , we had a Besa and i broke it because i though you were just misleading me ( and you were somehow..) . I truly i am no matter if decide to release my account or not ...Any way i think also you had a role in my blocking.Could this situation change?? you need another hand to improve Arvanites without me the view would be mediocre

HI

I have one comment and one suggestion. This picture is typicall irredentism, nationalism and propaganda. I suggest this picture should be deleted. They who support this picture claim something that is irrelevant such as EU membership (lol) but in fact they use this picture for something different, spreading away the idea of San Stefano Bulgaria and some kind of non natural, non historical and non cultural or linguistical unification. Please chek it and if there is possibility delete that picture. Regards--MacedonianBoy (talk) 19:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, you could ask the users to change the context in which they use the picture. I don't see a reason why it should be deleted besides the fact that you obviously don't like it. How they use the picture is pretty much irrelevant to the picture itself. --Laveol ^T 19:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Or we could just allow them to keep it so that I can throw WP:AGF out the window. Judging by this "patriot"'s edits, and the fact that he is a member of VMRO-BND, I'm just going to discard anything he says. I don't think you ever denied my identity, Laveol, so don't try defend him, please. BalkanFever 00:55, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I think you understood me wrong - the picture was created by User:TodorBozhinov and created in good faith, believe me. The fact that other editors use the picture in another context is not a problem of the uploader. --Laveol ^T 07:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Umm OK, but what exactly was Bozhinov's point? Where's this userbox he's meant to be using it for? BalkanFever 09:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I think it was something about the European integration of RoM, but I have to say I'm guessing more or less since Todor has not made a lot of edits for a year or more now. --Laveol ^T 13:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

So, wait, if I understand this right, a self-proclaimed "fighter (keyboard warrior?) for United Macedonia" is accusing people of irredentism? Riiiiiiich. (talk about ahistorical as well) 3rdAlcove (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Estonia article

Majority of the text has been already removed. See the changes at Estonia - restored and improved (copy-violation issue removal) article (permission to do so was given by the user talk who has been observing the process) At the moment I am afraid there is some Copyright paranoia going on. There is one section - transportation which needs still a little clean up from the issued text. This i will do in few hours. Karabinier (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Honestly, I can't really speak about the article, I haven't looked at that situation at all. What brought me to your page was the images. They definitely need a lot of cleanup. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

The Rocketeer (film)

Please check the edit history of the editor who has taken an interest in this article, in fact, any article, seemingly that I have written or edited. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC).

Sorry, but which other editor? – Incidentally, as I was clicking on your edit history, I came across your most recent edits regarding the images on Linda Finch. I'm afraid you can't use those two, they are obviously replaceable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 03:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I have searched for other images of Linda Finch and cannot find any. If you locate some I would think that would bolster your argument. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC).

Read the rules: non-free images can't be used if a free image exists or could be created. It is not necessary that one is already easily available. With living people, the default assumption is that you could always go and create one. Those cases get deleted as a matter of routine. HTH, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

You are actually suggesting that an image be created. Go on, tell me more. Bzuk (talk) 18:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC).

Username

Yours is by far the best username I've seen on wikipedia. I had to tell you. — _Maggot^Syn 13:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

FYI

That guy on Bulgarians is back: [2] Someone else made two edits after his revert so it will be hard to undo his edits. Khoikhoi 21:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Proper removal of Yot classified by you as hoax

If you removes this Yot across wikis, please don't sacrifice other letters. Because of this, please don't revert, but please only delete relevant Yot entries from text. Otherwise good part of mixed edits of this users consisted from approved letters plus disapproved Yot vanishes. This is not good to sacrifice many for little. 58.211.93.132 (talk) 09:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

You are banned, stay away. And your other additions about stigma, heta, sho and all the rest are so full of errors and inaccuracies much of it has to be removed anyway. At least stop meddling with languages that you can't understand. Your articles about "heta" on the other wikis, which you all created by blindly copying text from the respective "eta" articles and just exchanging the letter names, are total nonsense. Give it up, or you'll soon be banned on ever wiki of this project. And stop using those silly open proxies, who do you think you're kidding? Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_July_1

Re your opinion to delete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2nd_Police_Warning_4_God%27s_Emissary_1.jpg is valid since there are two images from different perspectives of the same event. If one image has to be deleted it would be better to delete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2nd_Police_warning_4_God%27s_Emissary.jpg. Would you reconsider your opinion in this scenario? The article as it appears is relatively new, incomplete and unknown to the greater membership. Perhaps only one out of a hundred viewers might have the interest to post an opinion. That's not much time to build a consensus before the deletion date. DoDaCanaDa (talk) 16:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Swearing

We have an emerging problem with this anonymous editor:[[3]], ex, comment titled FACK YOU GREEK. I am not sure about you, but his/her language seems quite unacceptable. Politis (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The Balkans

I think that Bože pravde (talk · contribs)'s current behavior is disruptive per ArbMac. Colchicum (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Another irredentist

Pls look hier and the user page to. Danke--Raso mk (talk) 18:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello Future Perfect at Sunrise

I hope you are doing fine.Long time we do not talk.Can you please check this guy out Gkmx (talk). His edits have been very disruptive lately. Starting with [4] naming Albania in Macedonian language, WP:POINT violation,3RR violation,ofending and not respected Wikipedia policies. I tried to find consensus with him, but it did not work. So,I am reporting him to you.Please help, and thank you.--Taulant23 (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Fasach

I said "SK2, especially iii". Feelings about NFCC aside, you can't deny that Fasach Nua has a horrible record for getting Doctor Who images deleted (and half of the ones that do get deleted get overturned at DRV). After seven months, I feel he is creating a chilling effect and flogging a dead horse more than he is helping. I also stand by my view of him being disruptive - if you drew a Venn Diagram of "images Fasach Nua has nominated for deletion" and "Doctor Who images listed for deletion", there would be a lot of images in the middle - seriously.

And seriously, you have a lot of gall to call me disruptive, even when the only thing I've done wrong is not agree with him and you. You can get away with saying that to a relatively new user, but not to me. Sceptre ^(talk) 12:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)