User talk:Marekchelsea

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see you have taken an interest in the presentation of individuals' nations, particularly footballers. You may be interested to know that from an encyclopaedic and constructive angle, a greater number of editors and readers appreciate historical accuracy, which is why these now defunct countries (eg. Yugoslavia, USSR etc.) are mentioned in some form. To date, all of your edits have been reverted; although I personally ammended most, there were a few which were reverted by other editors before I discovered them. By all means be constructive, and if you are familiar with information regarding these Croatian footballers which is lacking, be bold and edit freely. But for the meantime, please observe the practice of historical accuracy and abstain from removing old national names. Alter them if you will by ammending the order or the emphasis; present them in such a way that you are happy, but please do not delete the old national names. If you encounter problems of any kind, I will be pleased to help you. Best wishes. Evlekis (talk) 22:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello Marekchelsea, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gman124 talk 17:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Thomasz Wylenzek. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LAAFan 16:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to [[::Category:Italian-Slovenians‎]], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 11:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Moving pages while CFD is ongoing is inapproriate

As long as there's an ongoing discussion moving article into the proposed new category is not appropriate. Also, signing category pages the way you have[1][2][3][4][5] is also not something that should be done. Do you think you could clean up these edits? __meco (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Ziggy Rozalski

A tag has been placed on Ziggy Rozalski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Theseeker4 (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Damien Plessis

I have undone your edit to Damien Plessis stating that he's a Reunion footballer, as there is no sourced mention of that in the article. If you have a source, please provide it, and add some prose to the article rather than just adding another category. Thanks.

Hi, sorry, but i've undone it again. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, especially when the claim, in this case on fr.wikipedia is unsourced. Can you find a source on a club website or interview (n French is fine) that says where his ancestry is. --GedUK  10:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Marekchelsea! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Jniech (talk)} 22:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Category

Wygląda na to, że będzie "no consensus" i kategoria pozostanie na swoim miejscu. - Darwinek (talk) 14:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Dobra. Gdyby byly jakies klopoty, to daj znac. - Darwinek (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Tak byc nie powinno. Jesli ktos ma jakis problem z ta (czy inna) kategoria, powinien ja nominowac pod WP:CFD, rewertowanie tu nic nie da. Trzeba prowadzic dyskusje w WikiProjekcie na ten temat. - Darwinek (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

A polite notification

If you have any problems with my edits, you are most welcome to use my talk page to discuss them. I would be most grateful if you could refrain from calling my edits "sick". Thank you.Varsovian (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Ginczek

The newspaper article says, his grandparents were born in Silesia, it says nothing about a Polish background. Daniel Ginczek was born in 1991, let's assume his grandparents were older than 45 years at that time → they were born prior to 1945. Millions of Germans were born in Silesia prior to 1945, to call them or their grandchildren "of Polish descent" is absurd. Please find a ref for your claim or stop it. 84.139.251.125 (talk) 19:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Herbert Hupka, Herbert Czaja and Rudi Pawelka - these names all sound "Polish" but they are not. Please don't use the sound of names for Polonizing people. 84.139.241.70 (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Poles from Lithuania

I have nominated Category:Poles from Lithuania (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Please comment on content

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 10#Category:Poles_from_Lithuania. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Czeszcz

Hey Marek, dotyczących notatki do Darwinka [6], prosimy o kontakt ze mną za wskazówki i pomoc, gdy potrzebujesz. Dr. Dan (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Poland U19

Dlaczego usunąłeś ze składu Kas(z?)aka? PS11 (talk) 11:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Aha, nie zauważyłem, dzięki za poprawę. Przerzuciłem się wczoraj z plwiki na enwiki bo mi się już tam znudziło i widzę, że ty to samo zrobiłś:) PS11 (talk) 11:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Arka Gdynia

Pomożesz mi tworzyć hasła o wszystkich graczach polskiej Ekstraklasy? Idę po kolei alfabetem najpierw robię z Arki Gdynia, przy okazji zamieniam też infoboxy na te lepsze i aktualizuję. PS11 (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Patrz mój userpage, jeśli piłkarz zagrał w większej liczbie pkt po prostu daj years7, clubs7, caps7 itd. Napisz do mnie na gg jeśli możesz. PS11 (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ekstraklasa

Oczywiście, mogę pomóc. DK4 ^(Contribs) 14:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello, please do not copy/paste articles as you did here [7][8], as it makes article history a mess. Also please be advised not to mark major or controversial edits as mirror ones as it is considered disruptive, ideally use edit summaries. Cheers, M.K. (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

For your consideration

For your consideration: [9]. M.K. (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)