User talk:완젬스

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dualus (talk | contribs) at 00:11, 7 November 2011 (→‎Deletion debate closure: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Quick Reference



--Amadscientist (talk) 17:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


creating my talk page

proof i can edit woo hoo! [1]

American Jobs Act

Please talk about the article on it's talk page, not on my user talk page. Thank you. -- Scjessey (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edit filter

Thank you for reporting the false positive. The edit can be made now. Sorry for the inconvenience. Sole Soul (talk) 06:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barn star for you!

The Special Barnstar
For helping identify the exact policy in regards to when a primary source may still not be used EVEN with a secondary source! Bravo.

--Amadscientist (talk) 14:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tinychat?

I had asked whether you would agree to a Tinychat on my talk page; please let me know there. I also wondered whether you intend to update your !vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/99 Percent Declaration to match your comments there. I look forward to your reply. Dualus (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mind keeping a log of your chat

I'm sure I'm not alone in finding Dualus to be an untrustworthy and manipulative individual, and I find it troubling that he now wants to have off-Wiki discussions. Assuming you're going to have a discussion of articles and related happenings on WP, would you mind keeping a log of your chat session and possibly making that available to users interested in seeing it? Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 11:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get my email?

I hope to communicate with you soon. Dualus (talk) 17:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, why do you insist in communicating in a way that can't be tracked or verified? What's wrong with Article Talk and User Talk pages? Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 17:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a specific reason for objecting to this communication, please let me know. Are you trying to document my personal correspondence? Dualus (talk) 18:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed you. Dualus (talk) 19:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Essay invitation

I am inviting you to help contribute to a new essay article, WP:PAROOAH Wikipedia:Pulling a rabbit out of a hat. This essay is about no synthesis. Please feel free to add contributions, edit the article for errors and discuss the [edit: changed to not sound like I mean the essay article as policy) Wikipedia policies and guidelines for Original Research, on the talk page and how we can improve my essay! You may familiarize yourself with essays here: Wikipedia:Wikipedia essays.--Amadscientist (talk) 11:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation, I'd love to check it out! :D 완젬스 (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion debate closure

I note you marked the 99 Percent Declaration deletion debate closed as no consensus.[2] Thank you. Normally administrators close deletion debates. Dualus (talk) 00:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]