User talk:2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SQL (talk | contribs) at 18:35, 23 December 2023 (Note that a CU has already reviewed this block.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tim Hiller—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 23:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know we got the /40 account creation ban lifted, but I am requesting it is on the /48, even with checkuser information of abuse of multiple accounts, because the range is still large and you cannot edit here thanks to the /40 block coupled with it. ACC might deny an account as there is CU evidence against this, and I do request a CU review this.2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6 (talk) 11:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I know we got the /40 account creation ban lifted, but I am requesting it is on the /48, even with checkuser information of abuse of multiple accounts, because the range is still large and you cannot edit here thanks to the /40 block coupled with it. ACC might deny an account as there is CU evidence against this, and I do request a CU review this.[[Special:Contributions/2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6|2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6]] ([[User talk:2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6#top|talk]]) 11:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know we got the /40 account creation ban lifted, but I am requesting it is on the /48, even with checkuser information of abuse of multiple accounts, because the range is still large and you cannot edit here thanks to the /40 block coupled with it. ACC might deny an account as there is CU evidence against this, and I do request a CU review this.[[Special:Contributions/2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6|2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6]] ([[User talk:2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6#top|talk]]) 11:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know we got the /40 account creation ban lifted, but I am requesting it is on the /48, even with checkuser information of abuse of multiple accounts, because the range is still large and you cannot edit here thanks to the /40 block coupled with it. ACC might deny an account as there is CU evidence against this, and I do request a CU review this.[[Special:Contributions/2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6|2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6]] ([[User talk:2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6#top|talk]]) 11:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
 Checkuser note: I've already reviewed this block. SQLQuery Me! 18:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]