User talk:Abu badali: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎:o: I had noticed
Line 59: Line 59:
I just realized that you've been gone for a while, seeing as your last contribution was on 19:39, August 30, 2007! I appreciate your contributions, and hope you haven't left for good (though a break is probably a good idea :D). --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 01:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I just realized that you've been gone for a while, seeing as your last contribution was on 19:39, August 30, 2007! I appreciate your contributions, and hope you haven't left for good (though a break is probably a good idea :D). --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 01:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
:I had already noticed that. :-( [[User:ElinorD|ElinorD]] [[User talk:ElinorD|(talk)]] 02:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
:I had already noticed that. :-( [[User:ElinorD|ElinorD]] [[User talk:ElinorD|(talk)]] 02:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
::Well, it has been long enough. Get back to work! It's getting boring at IFD. :-) -[[User:Nv8200p|Nv8200p]] [[User_talk:Nv8200p|talk]] 02:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:31, 11 September 2007

A unidentified clerk (center) tries to bring to an end a great edit war involving dozens of respected editors. At her feet, three bewildered newcomers are seen lost in the middle of the dispute. PHOTO: SABINEWS/J.L. David

Archive

  1. From Apr 1 2004 to Aug 21 2006
  2. From Aug 21 2006 to Oct 31 2006
  3. From Oct 31 2006 to Feb 28 2007
  4. From Feb 28 2007 to May 30 2007
  5. From May 30 2007 to Aug 25 2007

IFD closure

Don't do this. Requiring some measure of verification is reasonable, undoing an adminstrative decision is not. Next time, bring your concern to the closing admin. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure it won't. I'm sure that you will bring any future concerns about improper closures to WP:DRV or the closing administrator's attention. I am also sure that you are aware of WP:POINT. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IFDs

Please help constructively improve image rationales rather than jumping the gun through the IFD process when such noms are not really necessary. I've noticed that a couple of your nominations were based on reasonings that were easily and quickly fixable. --Strothra 01:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could try to improve myself if you could give me examples of such "not really necessary" nominations and how the could have been quickly fixed. --Abu badali (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following IFD noms are prime examples: [1], [2], and [3]. All of which have been fixed. --Strothra 00:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arafat_in_Lebanon.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arafat_in_Lebanon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added the more accurate url to the file page. It is located in a pdf document about the photographer's stay in Beirut. The author of the photo is a wiki:user of the German Wikipedia. I copied the license tag that he used. You can try contacting him for more information. I will myself also. Al Ameer son
Thanks! But please, add a link to the de.wikipedia page where he released this as free material. Later, we could move the image to Commons. --Abu badali (talk) 19:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but you can clarify the link I am supposed to add to the image file on de.wikipedia. Once again sorry for inconvenience. --Al Ameer son
No incovenience at all! You should explain in Image:Arafat_in_Lebanon.jpg where did the image's author released the image as cc-by-sa-2.5. I couldn't find that information of the PDF. Is it on the german wikipedia? --Abu badali (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your patience, now I understand. I will try to find it on the German wikipedia, if that fails I will contact the author and add the link to the media file page. However it could take a day or two, depending on when he responds. Thanks again. --Al Ameer son
I guess it's here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:ARAFAT.jpg . I will remove the ifd right now! Thanks for working this out! --Abu badali (talk) 21:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I translated what was on the cc-by-sa license tag from the german wikipedia and I got this:
I'm not exactly an expert in this sector in wikipedia but I wonder if you can extract any information from that. If not please notify me again. Al Ameer son 15:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it's just saying the image was released under ("became under") the Creative Commons Attributtion Share-alike (denomination passing"). This information is already on the images description page. I believe everything is ok now. --Abu badali (talk) 00:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh OK Thats Great! Thanks for all your help, it has enhanced the Yasser Arafat article which lacks illustrations.

p.s. I've been wanting to ask you if Wikipedia would allow me or any other user to upload an image off a news website such as the BBC? --Al Ameer son 18:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When free is not preferrable

Although we don't always see eye to eye, I wonder if you'd agree with me here. I'd also appreciate your thoughs on whether images at List of Chobits characters‎, Trinity Blood‎, Chobits‎, Bleach (manga)‎, and List of Bleach characters‎ and similar articles are indeed ok under our fair use policies?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration request

A request for arbitration involving you has been filed here. Please view the request, and add any statements you feel are necessary for the ArbCom to consider in deciding whether to hear the dispute. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Challengedicon.svg

Hi, I used that image you created to represent injured footballers in some articles like this one FC_Barcelona_2007-08_season#Squad_stats. By the way, well done image. I think it's not the right image for injured people, since you intend to be use to disable people. So, I'd like to know if you could make a similar one to injured people. I think just adding a bottom part of the leg in a light color (maybe grey), like the person has a cast leg. Thanks in advance. --ClaudioMB 22:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Butting in here) I don't think Abu badali made that icon from scratch. If I remember correctly, he cropped it from a public domain road sign or something. You could make a request at Wikipedia:Requested pictures/Graphics, although it might get ignored -- or you could try asking at User:Zscout370/svg. Good luck! – Quadell (talk) (random) 01:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:o

I just realized that you've been gone for a while, seeing as your last contribution was on 19:39, August 30, 2007! I appreciate your contributions, and hope you haven't left for good (though a break is probably a good idea :D). --Iamunknown 01:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had already noticed that. :-( ElinorD (talk) 02:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it has been long enough. Get back to work! It's getting boring at IFD. :-) -Nv8200p talk 02:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]