User talk:Aeonx
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
| This is Aeonx's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MG5 (automobile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANCAP.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Buffy Sainte-Marie on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
1RR violation
This is a violation of the 1rr sanction in place on the ARBPIA topic area. Please self revert. Additionally, the edit summary is unacceptable. Keep your focus on content, not contributors. If you believe there is a behavioral issue take it to WP:AE or WP:ANI. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. I've raised the NPOV issues on the talk page, which is where it should be raised. The comment adds context to those unfamiliar. Therefore, I will not self-revert my comment. I think it's appropriate. I have not broken the 1RR/24 HOURS sanction. I suggest you review it yourself before trying to lecture me. Aeonx (talk) 03:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
This is unrelated to 1RR or 3RR. You are simply POV pushing by falsely claiming the news report of a reliable source, the Washington Post, as an opinion piece. If you can't get any other reliable source to counter the "most lethal war" statement, I kindly ask you to back down. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 06:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- The source is fine. No issues with the source, but don't interpret an OPINION as fact. It's not a fact. It's an opinion. Im not pushing any POV. Generally I suggest you take this to the talk page, article discussion / arguments don't belong on MY talk page. Accusing me of POV pushing is ironic. Maybe worth a look at the neutrality of your recent edits. Aeonx (talk) 06:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)