User talk:Anthony Duran: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 35: Line 35:


:::Point taken, I hope this has a good ending. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 16:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
:::Point taken, I hope this has a good ending. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 16:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Please I don't want any trouble, I'm being honest. Can we just leave the articles the way I edited them?

Revision as of 16:18, 7 September 2016

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Anthony Duran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prior versions seems better

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Satellizer, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Information icon Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:Satellizer can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Do not refactor other user's talk page comments. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Moka Akashiya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at User talk:Satellizer. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, don't no-one know how to write personalised messages anymore? Anyway, Anthony, leave the talk page as it is, and don't touch anyone else's comments in future, otherwise there might be a block next time. If you don't like a response on a talk page, chances are about 99.99% of Wikipedians won't be bothered one way or the other, arguments and quarrels happen here all the time, so we don't mind as long as the disruption is quickly stopped. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: There is a whole section about the user here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Love interests in harem anime content dispute I cant do much with a lack of communication if the user isn't responding about their actions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
People tend to respond to "don't do 'x' or there will be a block", either by not doing 'x' or by being subsequently unable to do 'x' from being blocked. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Point taken, I hope this has a good ending. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please I don't want any trouble, I'm being honest. Can we just leave the articles the way I edited them?