User talk:Bsadowski1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 97.87.25.229 to last revision by Bsadowski1 (HG)
Line 242: Line 242:


<small>Delivered by [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) at 22:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)</small>
<small>Delivered by [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) at 22:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)</small>

== A.E. Wilder-Smith ==

i am very sorry i didnt mean to delete that it said on my laptop the writing i entered was in --[[User:Godlover32795|Godlover32795]] ([[User talk:Godlover32795|talk]]) 18:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:45, 4 June 2009

Hello, Bsadowski1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, add a question to the Wikipedia:Help Desk or ask me on my Talk page. If you have any suggestions about how to improve this welcome, message, let me know. Again, welcome! JesseW 19:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! — Aitias // discussion 10:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Autorollback

You might want to be a bit more careful with it, you just reverted the iphone to the i-rape :) Googolplexed (talk) 07:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC) wait never mmind my browser was acting screwy, it was show the previous rev Googolplexed (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IPhone&diff=274077823&oldid=274077774 ;) Bsadowski1 (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Talk Page

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my talk page. Because of that, I'll forgive you for getting to all the other reverts before me. :-) Gnowor (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks twice for this and this :) Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 23:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diva Zappa

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Diva Zappa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I suggested over a fortnight ago that I didn't feel that Zappa was notable enough to have her own Wiki page and used the notability tag. No-one has made any effort in establishing notability and when I have searched for her on Google, I found little that suggested anything other than very minor claims for notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fol de rol troll (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the attack on my talk page. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 01:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Look at the revision history and see for yourself :)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Curious

I'd appreciate knowing the reasoning behind your revert here.[1] Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was an accident..I meant to click on the article when viewing the history thing. --Bsadowski1 (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, good. In that case I hope you can forgive me my edit comment reverting you William M. Connolley (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It won't happen again, I promise. --Bsadowski1 (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I've done that too as well as other accidental clicks (like blocking myself back when I was an admin...). Take care - Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 21:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A.E. Wilder-Smith

i am very sorry i didnt mean to delete that it said on my laptop the writing i entered was in --Godlover32795 (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]