User talk:Domer48: Difference between revisions
→Dessie Ellis: new section |
RV |
||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
:Will do.--<font face="Celtic">[[User:Domer48|<span style="color:#009900"><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style="color:#006600">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 13:17, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
:Will do.--<font face="Celtic">[[User:Domer48|<span style="color:#009900"><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style="color:#006600">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 13:17, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Ta. [[User:Scolaire|Scolaire]] ([[User talk:Scolaire|talk]]) 13:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
::Ta. [[User:Scolaire|Scolaire]] ([[User talk:Scolaire|talk]]) 13:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
== [[Dessie Ellis]] == |
|||
From [[WP:MOSBIO]]: |
|||
''The opening paragraph should have: |
|||
:Context (location, nationality, or ethnicity); |
|||
''In most modern-day cases this will mean'' '''''the country of which the person is a citizen or national''''' ''(according to each nationality law of the countries), or was a citizen when the person became notable. Ethnicity or sexuality should not generally be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the country of birth should not be mentioned in the opening sentence unless they are relevant to the subject's notability.'' [[User:Jonchapple|<font color="#004225">JonChapple</font>]][[User_talk:Jonchapple|<sup><font color="#F28500">Talk</font></sup>]] 10:31, 10 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:13, 10 August 2011
-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!
If you object to anything you read on this page, then the correct solution is to click here. |
- Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.
This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain. |
This editor is a Veteran Editor II and is entitled to display this Bronze Editor Star. |
Archives |
---|
Useful links
Irish Manual of Style~
Policy ~
Assume good faith ~
Citing sources ~
Civility ~
Consensus ~
Dispute resolution ~
Etiquette ~
No original research ~
What Wikipedia is not ~
No personal attacks ~
Neutral point of view ~
POINT ~
Reliable sources ~
Verifiability ~
WP:Attribution ~
WP:Synthesis ~
tools ~
WP:Avoid peacock terms ~
Wikipedia:Avoid weasel terms
Domer48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Useful Noticeboard
3RR~ WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ~ Third opinion Noticeboard ~ Wikipedia:Honesty ~ Wikipedia:No original research/noticeboard
Template messages
Warning templates ~ Template messages/Sources of articles ~ Template messages/Cleanup ~ Template messages/Disputes
Format for reference
Cite error: The opening <ref>
tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page).
Template for Abcom / 1rr -sanctions - add {{ }} Troubles restriction - add {{ }}
Diff
Shatter Resistance
Hi Domer. The AE on Shatter Resistance was archived without any further action. I don't think it would be fair if he was blocked or whatever after he had gone nearly a week without editing the article, but I think it's very bad that an admin didn't at least post to his talk page to tell him what he did was wrong, and why. I'll leave it up to you whether you want to follow it up. Regards, Scolaire (talk) 18:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- In the AE request, on the "Enforcement action requested" I left it as "To be determined" which in this case meant as you say no action at all. However they are now aware of 1RR, and should they suggest otherwise the link to the AE request will be useful. --Domer48'fenian' 08:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Reinforcements needed over here. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 21:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Reinforcements not required; I have removed the infobox and strongly warned the placing editor against edit warring. If a discussion is started then I expect that participants will remain civil in discussing whether consensus should change - and if an edit war breaks out I expect to be informed so I can quickly put an end to it. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Irish version of "We Saw a Vision" by Liam Mac Uistin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Irish version of "We Saw a Vision" by Liam Mac Uistin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:"We Saw a Vision" by Liam Mac Uistin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:"We Saw a Vision" by Liam Mac Uistin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Parnell Mansion House, Dublin.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parnell Mansion House, Dublin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 19:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
{{FoP-Ireland}}
§93 of the Irish copyright law permits photographers to take pictures of sculptures, buildings, and works of artistic craftsmanship that are permanently located in a public place or premises open to the public, and to publish such pictures in any way. Irish law is in this respect modeled on UK law, and in the absence of any specific case law to the contrary it is reasonable to assume that the rules will be identical. See the United Kingdom section for more details.
- Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000, Chapter 6, §93
- Irish copyright law--Domer48'fenian' 19:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Who was the artist anyway?
Can't really see this being a copyvio, but arising out of this, and more to satisfy curiosity than directly on the specific issue at hand, anyone know who did paint the portrait? I know its a bit off topic Domer, beg pardon, but Google has let me down on this one, and I kinda need to know now. RashersTierney (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Constance Markievicz
Hi Domer. Re the RM, it looks as though it will go through, since you now support it, but it would help if you would strike through your oppose from a couple of days ago. Thanks, Scolaire (talk) 06:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)