User talk:EncMstr

Conrad Shindler House page

Hi, FrankieRae. I did create that page but only to move it out of the Shepherd University page that it was overwhelming. Sorry I can't be of more help. Naniwako (talk) 16:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Caruthers Bridge

Because there's no need for it to simultaneously be filed in both Category:Planned or proposed bridges and Category:Proposed bridges in the United States. Bearcat (talk) 23:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

I figured it could be something like that. Thanks. —EncMstr (talk) 01:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

TruthfulPerson

While it's true that edit warring doesn't require a 3RR violation, I hadn't seen her edit since my 3RR warning at 17:30UTC. Premature block, maybe?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Considering the user's history of contentious edits, there is no doubt she is being intentionally disruptive. It's only 12 hours for a cool down period. Once that expires, she can choose to 3RR and hit the electric fence. —EncMstr (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

List of apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction issue, 2010

I'm asking for your interference, since I'm meeting an unreasonable user, see, he's deleting my work, what I did is that I fitted items into table formats, as it'd be easier for other users to add items and items in table format are better perceptive than without. He's impeding my progress of creating tables. And as I'm processing it, I also sorting items out like adding separate sections for films, television series, novels etc. And he destroys it everything! I don't want edit conflicts, so come and make things clear. Now I'm just blocked from improving article. Userpd (talk) 18:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Please discuss the issue with all other editors on the the article's talk page. Your revert You aren't helping, dude isn't helpful enough to foster collaboration. Rather than revert it, please find common ground perhaps by adding examples (a sample table with a few rows) on the talk page. Using edit summaries like don't remove the table aren't helpful; instead, use the summary to express why you think your edit is an improvement, or reference the pertinent guideline. —EncMstr (talk) 19:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

The user claimed he did not add material, but as you can see he did [[1]]. He has also liste his last two undoo as minor edits, even though htey re-instate deleted material [[2]] & [[3]]. This is why I deleted his work. He has tried to add material whislt claming (and hiding the fact) that he is not.Slatersteven (talk) 19:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that your main goal isn't to resolve the issue, but to toss up accusations as more as you can. In your first link, and generally, I have only added "The Faculty". Everything else was before. I will be repetitive, but like I said I was just fitting items into table format, which is much better than just "raw" list of items. Userpd (talk) 19:44, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunatly this has now been pushed in to an edit war, and dangerously close to breaching 3RR. I think this may need arbitration as there seems to be no possibility of compromise.Slatersteven (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Let's try protecting the page for a few days. See if you can work out some consensus. —EncMstr (talk) 23:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

A susgestion has been made that we only include fiction that an RS has caled apoclayptic. That seems to me resoanble, also I do not think consensus can be achived aas the other party admits that his inclusion criteria are based on assumptions of what happen (in other words OR). Perhpas you should explain what OR means.Slatersteven (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps you can offer some advice. The debate seems to be going round in circles. Mainly it would seem because (if I am correct) that Userpd does not accept that assumptions about undeveloped story arcs are OR. He even seems to agree that the film we are debating does not in fact feature an apocalypse but that one might have developed later.Slatersteven (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Albany, Oregon

Hello EncMstr,

I have seen you edit on Albany, Oregon before and I am looking for so slightly more expert advice on what to do with it next, what I can do to improve it. I have added alot of material to it and need people to look it over and tell me what would make it better. I am still very new to the Wiki process and I think fresh eyes would help me make it a better article and maybe get it to B-Class.MathewDill (talk) 06:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

How do you...

Thanks for contesting John Sellwood by the way and I'd like to ask how do you contest a deletion?BGinOC (talk)