User talk:GHcool

Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus

Regarding the explanation for your recent edit, I would be interested to know what makes you believe you should get your own way until discussion is settled. This source is a new addition to the encyclopedia which has been challenged by a number of editors. Normal practice would dictate that it stays out pending consensus. Dlv999 (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

And further, that article is subject to a 1RR, a rule that you violated on 2 February. I didnt report it because I generally think highly of you as an editor and wasnt looking to create drama, but repeated reverts can be reported. nableezy - 18:57, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Globalize

You added the Globalize template to Jewish views on marriage. Why? Debresser (talk) 16:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

I will respond on the talk page. --GHcool (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Henry George

If Henry George ran on that ticket, which he did, I think it is worth mentioning in the text about Jeffersonian democracy. He may well not have been a very typical Jeffersonian Democrat, but the ticket had that name. The Horn Blower (talk) 20:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

I disagree. Just because he named himself after Jefferson doesn't mean it has anything necessarily to do with the concept of Jeffersonian democracy. --GHcool (talk) 22:18, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey GHcool; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Israeli–Palestinian conflict

Can you please explain this removal? Do you consider the article in its current version is plenty of sources?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

As of this writing, there are 238 sources. I don't think the article lacks sources. --GHcool (talk) 06:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Right from the start, the ″History″ section is plagued of unsourced paragraphs. I'm reinstating the {{morerefs}} tag. You do not own the article.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Why not just tag the history section instead of the whole article? --GHcool (talk) 19:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I chose not to tagbomb the article, but to place a single tag at the top of the page to notice everyone the article is in need of more sourcing. You removed the {{morerefs}} tag again, even when there are unsourced sentences/paragraphs all over the article. This unilateral action shows that you think you own the article, as I said above. Do reinstate the tag or I will seek dispute resolution to solve this issue.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:37, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Either write {{cn}} next to the sentences you feel ought to be cited or tag the section. Don't tag the whole article. --GHcool (talk) 23:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

2013 Wikinic

	Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park
	You are invited to the third Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there! —howcheng {chat} 01:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

Request to self-revert

This edit is a clear breach of the 1RR restriction on articles relating to the Arab-Israel conflict. I request that you revert yourself; if you do not do so, I will request that approproiate action uis taken under WP:ARBPIA. RolandR (talk) 22:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions

I believe with your latest edit you are in violation of 1rr and I will file a report if you do not self revert. Aside from the 1rr violation I believe that your activity on the page violates WP:NOTADVOCATE. It is difficult to explain how you can justify filling the article with advocacy sources used for claims against third parties on the one hand, while on the other deleting reliably sourced information cited to a third party academic source on the other giving only your own opinion on the topic as justification for deletion. this edit pattern is not consistent with the policies and the purposes of the encyclopaedia. Dlv999 (talk) 16:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)