User talk:Unbroken Chain: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rodhullandemu (talk | contribs)
re
a summary
Line 44: Line 44:
Can't really say I'm going to stop using the word fuck. Would you point out how mentioning [[[[Wikipedia:Competence is required|incompetant]]]] is a violation of NPA? [[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket#top|talk]]) 23:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Can't really say I'm going to stop using the word fuck. Would you point out how mentioning [[[[Wikipedia:Competence is required|incompetant]]]] is a violation of NPA? [[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket#top|talk]]) 23:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:There's a difference between using the guideline [[WP:COMPETENCE]] as a reason for blocking and using the word as a breach of [[WP:CIVIL|civility policy]], and I note you're not asking for an unblock, which I might have declined anyway on the basis that if another editor is offended by the language you use, and asks you to stop using it, you should do so. This isn't a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NewUser7&diff=next&oldid=220506353|crazy den of pigs]] where the lowest common denominator prevails; it is a collaborative environment in which competing interests and values should be mediated. If that has to be by blocking, so be it. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 00:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
:There's a difference between using the guideline [[WP:COMPETENCE]] as a reason for blocking and using the word as a breach of [[WP:CIVIL|civility policy]], and I note you're not asking for an unblock, which I might have declined anyway on the basis that if another editor is offended by the language you use, and asks you to stop using it, you should do so. This isn't a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NewUser7&diff=next&oldid=220506353|crazy den of pigs]] where the lowest common denominator prevails; it is a collaborative environment in which competing interests and values should be mediated. If that has to be by blocking, so be it. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 00:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

::That was so far off base what happened here that's funny. I'm blocked for being direct and open. I started this by asking a SPA to explain why they were making a removal, above you will see that this was completely ignored and they wanted to play games. I responded, they bitched got someone gullible and block happy and I'm blocked for 24 hours. Whatever. [[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket#top|talk]]) 00:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:11, 4 June 2010


Please do not feed the trolls.

Recent Changes

List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change

15 May 2024

15 May 2024


Please discuss

After reverting my work with the comment "take it to the talk page" you continue to revert without bothering to discuss. If you feel so strongly about the wording of the article that you make such changes, please show the courtesy of explaining your actions like everyone else does. BlackCab (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I though tit was pithy, consider your own reversions.....[[1]], [[2]]. Looks aq little like the pot calling the kettle black wouldn't you think? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of the diffs you provided above were mine, so whatever point you're trying to make lacks any validity. Unlike you, I have spelt out my reasons for editing the article the way I have. If you're not prepared to discuss changes you make to articles, then don't make them. BlackCab (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Either you are a incompetant or are intentionally being obtuse. Your name is BlackCab no? [[3]] This is clearly you, you are on the lest undoing a revision without notice. Here is the link again [[4]], you are on the left this time you left a edit summary but I reverted as it was a good addition. Either way face up to what you're doing or stop your fucking games I don't have the inclination to play connect the dots for you. . Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your offensive behavior

Hello, Unbroken Chain. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Hell in a Bucket. Thank you. BlackCab (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Epthitachyphtaliphtherdipthyclicstalacious

Dude, what does it mean, seriously? I want to know. Is it something about a long term pattern of abuse? I think it's funny you pasted that on my talk page without any investigation... You honestly made my day, man. Hilarious! Professor Chaos (talk) 06:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I made mine as well. I didn't look at the dates of some of your previous warnings. My apologies for the rather terse warning. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Haha... I have vandalized twice... I put "shit-ton" in the U.S. units of measure conversion units table, and it lasted an hour... then this, as part of a discussion on whether it was really a word. I'm not really after you, I figured it was a standard warning... the rest of my Wikipedia edits are all legit, haha. Professor Chaos (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive incivility and personal attacks. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  Sandstein  19:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please use civil and polite language at all times, especially when others tells you that your use of expletives bothers them. Directing profanities towards others and calling them incompetents is not compatible with Wikipedia's collaborative environment. Thanks,  Sandstein  19:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can't really say I'm going to stop using the word fuck. Would you point out how mentioning [[incompetant]] is a violation of NPA? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a difference between using the guideline WP:COMPETENCE as a reason for blocking and using the word as a breach of civility policy, and I note you're not asking for an unblock, which I might have declined anyway on the basis that if another editor is offended by the language you use, and asks you to stop using it, you should do so. This isn't a [den of pigs] where the lowest common denominator prevails; it is a collaborative environment in which competing interests and values should be mediated. If that has to be by blocking, so be it. Rodhullandemu 00:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That was so far off base what happened here that's funny. I'm blocked for being direct and open. I started this by asking a SPA to explain why they were making a removal, above you will see that this was completely ignored and they wanted to play games. I responded, they bitched got someone gullible and block happy and I'm blocked for 24 hours. Whatever. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]