User talk:JGabbard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JGabbard (talk | contribs) at 00:12, 26 September 2022 (Unblock request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A page you started (You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart), JGabbard!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for writing the article about "You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart)" by Dionne Warwick. I'm a big fan of her work in the 60s with Burt Bacharach and Hal David.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.


A page you started (Jelly Jungle (of Orange Marmalade)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jelly Jungle (of Orange Marmalade), JGabbard!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Is this where Tangerine Dream got their name??

That's an intriguing thought, but it looks like T.D. predates the song by a year or so.

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Supplement to block notice

The block notice and log entry for this user isn't too informative, but if anyone wishes to view the discussion which lead to this user being indefinitely blocked, it can be found at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#JGabbard spreading white genocide conspiracy theory on South African farm attacks article. They were not actually banned, and some editors expressed hope that they would learn, do some self-reflection and reconsider some of their unacceptable views. Even so, some of those editors did still consider that an indefinite block was in order, but not a full siteban. Consensus seemed to be for an indefinite block, not so much an outright ban, but that is just my assessment of it, please read it yourself, as my assessment may not be the same as others. I'm noarchiving this to pin it, as it is going to be of interest to anyone trying to view this page. If the user doesn't want this here, they are welcome to remove it. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 02:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle (slang) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle (slang) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle (slang) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laughter in the Rain - Neil Sedaka.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Laughter in the Rain - Neil Sedaka.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Reunited - Peaches & Herb.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Reunited - Peaches & Herb.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:It's Gonna Take a Miracle - Deniece Williams.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the whole recording of the song already understood without a cover art of the UK single release. also, a free image of another release exists and is used. may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Star Wars Theme Cantina Band - Meco.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Star Wars Theme Cantina Band - Meco.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:I'm Coming Out - Diana Ross.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

displaying more than one edition normally discouraged by WP:NFCC#3a. this is no exception. preferring the other (US) release....

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

JGabbard (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to appeal a block from five months ago, please. Upon self-reflection, I made the error of using a Talk Page as a soapbox for inflammatory sociopolitical comments without reliable substantiation. This action was disruptive, and I sincerely apologize for this breach of decorum. I will refrain from doing so in the future. Thank you very much for your consideration.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to appeal a block from five months ago, please. Upon self-reflection, I made the error of using a Talk Page as a soapbox for inflammatory sociopolitical comments without reliable substantiation. This action was disruptive, and I sincerely apologize for this breach of decorum. I will refrain from doing so in the future. Thank you very much for your consideration. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to appeal a block from five months ago, please. Upon self-reflection, I made the error of using a Talk Page as a soapbox for inflammatory sociopolitical comments without reliable substantiation. This action was disruptive, and I sincerely apologize for this breach of decorum. I will refrain from doing so in the future. Thank you very much for your consideration. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to appeal a block from five months ago, please. Upon self-reflection, I made the error of using a Talk Page as a soapbox for inflammatory sociopolitical comments without reliable substantiation. This action was disruptive, and I sincerely apologize for this breach of decorum. I will refrain from doing so in the future. Thank you very much for your consideration. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

- JGabbard (talk) 00:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]