User talk:JGabbard/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:JGabbard. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited What You Gave Me (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page That's the Way Love Is (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Crimson and Clover - Joan Jett and the Blackhearts.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crimson and Clover - Joan Jett and the Blackhearts.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 05:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 19:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dance With Me - Orleans.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dance With Me - Orleans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your actions with respect to This Girl's in Love with You. WP:RM requires discussion and consensus to disambiguate a title with incoming links. Also, please review WP:TWODABS. A disambiguation page is merely a navigational tool, and is entirely unnecessary if navigation can be accomplished with a hatnote. bd2412 T 14:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:She's Trouble - Michael Jackson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:She's Trouble - Michael Jackson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics - you've had one before but they need to be renewed every year
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 13:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Curtis Stigers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Pack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:A Taste of Honey (LP) colored vinyl image.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A Taste of Honey (LP) colored vinyl image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
Please refrain from uploading disruptive images with no encyclopedic value, such as A Taste of Honey (album). It is considered vandalism. As explained here, your image has no relevance to the infobox; it is not an image of any album cover but of a 45 rpm record titled "Boogie Oogie Oogie". Dan56 (talk) 03:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Dan56 -- Good faith edits should never be considered vandalism. My history of contribs speaks for itself. I did, however, fail to notice that the image is a 45 (because of its small hole, usually a 33 RPM) and I apologize for that. - JGabbard (talk) 12:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:A Taste of Honey (LP) colored vinyl image.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A Taste of Honey (LP) colored vinyl image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Willow Weep for Me - Jan & Dean.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Willow Weep for Me - Jan & Dean.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 04:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Heard It in a Love Song - The Marshall Tucker Band.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Heard It in a Love Song - The Marshall Tucker Band.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (I Wanna Stay with You) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating I Wanna Stay with You.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for developing the new article on the song "I Wanna Stay with You".
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:35, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Soul Coaxing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to If I Were a Carpenter
- Yellow River (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to IRMA
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Amygdalin. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 04:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Urine therapy
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Current link: WP:ANI#Fringe edits at Urine therapy following warnings. BiologicalMe (talk) 01:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Long time no see. For notification, I nominated the image File:You Are the Woman - Firefall.jpg for discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 May 7. -- George Ho (talk) 07:44, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Soapboxing
Please read WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:SOAPBOX'Slatersteven (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- It is amazing your editor page is still up and not deleted. Talk about polemic. 209.152.44.201 (talk) 21:21, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe because I tend to obey policy.Slatersteven (talk) 12:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Odd that the IP complains about Slatersteven's pages, which are not particularly polemic, on JGabbard's page, which definitely is. I'm just saying. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:14, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe because I tend to obey policy.Slatersteven (talk) 12:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
You are banned from all pages and edits related to complementary and alternative medicine, broadly construed for six months. GoldenRing (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Stay Awhile - Dusty Springfield.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stay Awhile - Dusty Springfield.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Notice
This may not be news: Please note that Wikipedia is not a forum for propaganda, the promotion of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories or for proselytism. User:JGabbard#Perspectives/Protesting abuses! appears to indirectly attack fellow editors by implying dark motives. I would like to remind you of WP:MEDRS. We are expected to edit according to policies and guidelines and must understand that editing here is a privilege, not a right. Also relevant: WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS, WP:POLEMIC, WP:AGF, WP:PSCI, WP:FREESPEECH, WP:NOTWEBHOST ... Since the rest of the page is more relevant to Wikipedia, instead of nominating it at WP:MfD I will take the liberty to boldly blank that section. As you already know, there are other places and Wikis for this. That aside, thank you for your music related contributions. —PaleoNeonate – 15:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Thriller and WP:SPS
Please note that, per WP:SPS, wikis are not reliable sources and should not be used in citations. Consequently I have reverted your addition to Thriller. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 02:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Celebrate Me Home, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page You Don't Know Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
"This Heart"
Not sure what you have done, but in creating This Heart (song) for the Gene Redding song, you've still kept the talk page for the song of the same name by Sweethearts of the Rodeo, so they don't match up. I just thought I should let you know. Richard3120 (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paper Lace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hitchin' a Ride (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Can't Help Falling in Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Engelbert Humperdinck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Celebrate - Three Dog Night.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Celebrate - Three Dog Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raspberry Beret, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tamko
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tamko, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.tamko.com/about/media-center/news-releases/post/2019/05/31/TAMKO-donates-$100-000-to-red-cross-for-southwest-missouri-disaster-relief-efforts-following-may-22-2019-tornadoes. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yogiile (talk) 06:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Mink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ring My Bell - Anita Ward.jpg
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on File:Ring My Bell - Anita Ward.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ƏXPLICIT 09:28, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating The Southern Sea.
User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
I'm wondering if this might be better to point at South Sea. There appears to be very little use online of "The Southern Sea" as a name for the Gulf of Mexico, and there appears to be at least one animal that has "southern sea" in its name (the southern sea otter) and lives nowhere near the gulf.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 17:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Rosguill:Hi, thanks for your note. You may do as you wish with the link; I don't strongly object. But being originally from Gulfport, Mississippi, I do know of its historical and cultural use as an alternative term. I can tell you that along the coast it is almost as common as the term "The War of Northern Aggression" to refer to the US Civil War, but instead of redirecting there it redirects to Names of the American Civil War. Anecdotally, "The Southern Sea" was used as an alternative descriptor for the Gulf of Mexico, especially during and for some time after the Mexican-American War, and retains minor use even today. In popular culture, the most notable use of the term I know of is in Three Dog Night's song "Yellow Beach Umbrella," nicely covered by Bette Midler[1] and others. - JGabbard (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sweet Loving Man - Morris Albert.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sweet Loving Man - Morris Albert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Build Me Up Buttercup - Foundations.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Build Me Up Buttercup - Foundations.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 03:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sh-Boom - The Chords.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sh-Boom - The Chords.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yours Until Tomorrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malcolm Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Back Stabbers - O'Jays.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Back Stabbers - O'Jays.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Knock on Wood - Amii Stewart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Knock on Wood - Amii Stewart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
August 2019
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Project Veritas. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You may wish to retract your comments; otherwise, they may be used as evidence in future administrative action against you. You're welcome to disagree with other editors; you're not welcome to call them derogatory or defamatory names. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have retracted that portion of my comment, which was general in nature and not specific to this article. However, it does accurately reflect the reality of my editorial experience in this realm. Please pardon my jadedness. - JGabbard (talk) 03:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
AE opened
Because this is not your first go-round, and because you can't seem to stop casting aspersions on those who disagree with you politically, I've opened an Arbitration Enforcement discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#JGabbard. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Tamko for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamko (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yogiile (talk) 11:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:San Francisco (Be Sure to Wear Flowers in Your Hair) - Scott McKenzie.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:San Francisco (Be Sure to Wear Flowers in Your Hair) - Scott McKenzie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1944 establishments in Missouri
A tag has been placed on Category:1944 establishments in Missouri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tamko logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tamko logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lover - Taylor Swift.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lover - Taylor Swift.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Stefan Molyneux
I have tried to make some changes to the Stefan Molyneux page which I feel is very one-sided, but my changes are getting reversed out by the user NBlund. We are having a discussion about it on the Talk page. I am willing to compromise and work with him, but he appears to be unwilling to concede anything at all. Perhaps you can chime in and give your opinion? As you have also in the past expressed the view that it is one sided.Gmann101 (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Done! Hope it helps. Thanks for contacting me. - JGabbard (talk) 17:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Homegrown Tomatoes - Guy Clark.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Homegrown Tomatoes - Guy Clark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1958 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockin' Robin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Beep Beep - The Playmates.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Beep Beep - The Playmates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Please don't change chart section formatting to suit yourself
Hi. Please don't change chart sections to combine charts and certifications like you did here. I created the article for "Sucker", and I don't see how in any way that benefits it. First of all, on most "modern" song articles (as in, on most articles from the 1990s and beyond), the section header "chart history" is not a thing—I know you've probably added it to thousands of song and album articles from the '80s and earlier, but it's really not used very widely outside of those. Charts and certifications are also rarely combined anymore, because most active chart editors stopped combining them years ago and some even went about actively separating them. That might be how you prefer to format chart sections on articles you created, but please stop doing it to articles you didn't create. If I notice you reformatting charts sections to how you prefer them on articles you did not create, I will revert you. If you edit war or disregard WP:BRD, I will report you to an administrator because you have reverted me indirectly for undoing you in the past, probably hoping I wouldn't notice, and it has been a pain. Your history of adding unreliable sources for old charts (using IP address websites and blogs for chart positions) and poor formatting choices (like putting a space between a reference and italic markup) honestly means you should be monitored more than you probably are. I do not wish to be pinged by you, because I know you will type out a paragraph defending yourself and having a go back at me for "condescending" to you or whatever, but I'm not having an argument with you. Last time I sent you a message you typed altogether too much and the argument was a waste of time. I'm just telling you what I will do if I see you reformat chart sections to suit your outdated personal preference—and before you try to level the same accusation of personal preference at me, separating charts and certifications was done long before I did it. Thanks. Ss112 22:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Brighteon.com
Hello JGabbard,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Brighteon.com for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 03:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Edit warring and genre warring at Peg (song)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Peg (song), you may be blocked from editing. isento (talk) 22:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Peg (song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. isento (talk) 22:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boz Scaggs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:My Way - Frank Sinatra.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:My Way - Frank Sinatra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Your Precious Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Bishop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ain't It a Shame - Fats Domino.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ain't It a Shame - Fats Domino.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Under My Thumb - Rolling Stones.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Under My Thumb - Rolling Stones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Almost Like Being in Love - Michael Johnson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Almost Like Being in Love - Michael Johnson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:I Only Wanna Be With You single cover - Bay City Rollers.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:I Only Wanna Be With You single cover - Bay City Rollers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Unplanned, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [2] is a WP:SYNTH claim that argues a professional is lying. Do not do that again. You will be subject to sanctions. jps (talk) 11:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- I apologize. I did not realize that all "professionals" are to be considered infallible sources and speak Ex cathedra, even in the face of conflicting current scientific research. - JGabbard (talk) 12:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Snark all you want. You've been around Wikipedia long enough to know better. jps (talk) 12:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darren Holden (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Give Up on Us (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Unforgettable - Nat King Cole.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Incorrectly used in Unforgettable (Nat King Cole song); none of the single releases use this cover (45cat, discogs (1), (2), (3), others). This artwork turns out to have been used for reprints of Unforgettable (Nat King Cole album); see discogs and eBay. Most similar to vinyl reprint edition.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Unforgettable - Nat King Cole.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Unforgettable - Nat King Cole.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Betcha by Golly, Wow - Stylistics.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded and then replaced by File:Betcha by Golly Wow by The Stylistics Spain artwork.png. Also, can't tell whether the teal color is actual background color of the Spain release (see discogs, rateyourmusic, ebay).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Betcha by Golly, Wow - Stylistics.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Betcha by Golly, Wow - Stylistics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:What the World Needs Now Is Love - Jackie DeShannon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This product is the 1970 German single release of "Brighton Hill", the A-side track. "What the World Needs Now Is Love" is the B-side track of the single release. Not suitable image for the article. Replaced by File:What the World Needs Now Is Love by Jackie DeShannon 1965 Italian single.png.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tainted Love - Gloria Jones.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tainted Love - Gloria Jones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:What the World Needs Now Is Love - Jackie DeShannon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:What the World Needs Now Is Love - Jackie DeShannon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:If We Make It Through December - Merle Haggard.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:If We Make It Through December - Merle Haggard.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
"Socially awkward penguin" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socially awkward penguin. Since you had some involvement with the Socially awkward penguin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Dominique - The Singing Nun.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic . Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Venus - Shocking Blue.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Venus - Shocking Blue.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:This Girl's in Love with You - Dionne Warwick.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:This Girl's in Love with You - Dionne Warwick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve Hold Tight (Bread song)
Hello, JGabbard,
Thank you for creating Hold Tight (Bread song).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
It would be good to add a source to support the billboard rankings, since they form part of the song's claim to notability. Please check the other tweaks I made, and note that there seems to be a problem with the image. Cheers
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
GirthSummit (blether) 14:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK thanks, I appreciate your efforts. I created it only just a few minutes ago, so it's still a work in progress. - JGabbard (talk) 14:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Mr. Lonely - Bobby Vinton.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic . Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK, done. - JGabbard (talk) 20:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Liz Crokin article
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Liz Crokin a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Liz Crokin. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- Netoholic @ 19:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
ANI Notice
I have asked for you to be topic banned at ANI. jps (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 16:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
A conspiracy theorist is not a whistleblower
Why on earth did you make this edit? -- Valjean (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Because Dr. Mikovits has been at best mischaracterized/misunderstood, and at worst, smeared/defamed. It's unwarranted, and it's also a WP:BLP violation. - JGabbard (talk) 17:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- We write what RS say, and in this case they are right. "Whistleblower" is not based on RS, but is OR made out of whole cloth. -- Valjean (talk) 17:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Topic banned
Per consensus of the community, you are banned from editing the topics of vaccination, conspiracy theorists, and COVID-19, all broadly construed. Generally this means you may not edit articles nor participate in discussions related to these topics on any Wikipedia page, subject to regular exceptions. This restriction has been logged at WP:EDR. Violations of this restriction may be enforced by more aggressive sanctions which may include your account being blocked from editing. If you are in doubt about whether a page is covered by this restriction you are encouraged to ask before editing. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi - I thought your username was familiar, just noticed the above comment reminding me that I'd reviewed one of your music articles. Please do keep working on articles in that subject area, where your contributions and knowledge really are appreciated. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 21:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: -- Thank you very much for the compliment and the encouragement, Girth! That means a lot. - JGabbard (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Another admin has pointed out to me that my enacting of this ban was technically against policy, therefore my statement above is invalid. I have reopened the discussion at ANI for further comment. My apologies for the confusion. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry for the back and forth for you but the ban has been reimposed. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Freeman Hospital, Joplin Mo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Freeman Hospital, Joplin Mo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Joey Levine songs
A tag has been placed on Category:Joey Levine songs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chevy Van - Sammy Johns.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chevy Van - Sammy Johns.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Weary Blues comment
You wrote "The song is notable in and of itself". Can you explain what you mean by that? Thanks.
Vmavanti (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, the song is notable because it is a "perennial jazz standard," the topic of academic works, and also because its view counts are higher than even for the artist himself. Plus, the cover by the McGuire Sisters became a chart hit. So if anything, I would redirect his article to the song before I would redirect the song to him. - JGabbard (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Do you understand the differences between the everday use of the word "notable" and Wikipedia's rules about Notability?
Vmavanti (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)- (talk page stalker) Vmavanti, JGabbard said that the song is the topic of academic works - it sounds like they have a solid understanding of Wikipedia's rules about notability. GirthSummit (blether) 16:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Don't butt in, Mrs. Kravitz. That's treating people like babies who can't speak for themselves. This doesn't involve you. There was no offense intended in the question. It's a simple question of fact. It deserves an answer. It's civil and proper to answer plain, direct questions.
Vmavanti (talk) 16:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC) - I don't see how anyone could be proud of calling themselves a "talk page stalker" or how this fits into any of the nicey-nice talk about collegiality and civility on Wikipedia. A stalker is a bad thing.
Vmavanti (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)- Vmavanti, the (talk page stalker) template is widely used, and even comes with a link to a humorous essay explaining what it means - I think it fits in just fine with collegiality. I'm not sure what you mean by addressing me as Mrs. Kravitz (I don't know who that is, and since you haven't provided a link, I can't easily find out), but I'm happy to assume that it's friendly banter and not an insult. Please don't tell me not to butt in though - absent a request from JGabbard that I don't post here, I'll make whatever observations I wish. Best GirthSummit (blether) 17:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- You feel that butting in is productive and helpful? Have you done an internet search for Mrs. Kravitz yet?
Vmavanti (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)- Vmavanti, no, I haven't. If you'd like to give me a link I'll look at it; alternatively, you could just explain what you mean? I don't accept that commenting on a talk page equates to butting in: I've never heard anyone say anything like that before here, it seems unconventional. GirthSummit (blether) 23:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't try to be unconventional, but it does work out that way sometimes. I'm talking about prudence. How often do you peek into the neighbors' windows? I'm leaving aside whether you have some connection to JGabbard, so if there's some understanding that you speak for this person, then I guess it's okay. I've seen this phenomenon before, and I'm trying to understand it: Two people have a conversation, then someone shows up, interrupts the conversation, often trying to bring it to a halt. It's something like ventriloquism. Given that discussion is the foundation of Wikipedia, this strikes me as bad form, as does tut-tutting simple, direct questions. I know that we're free, within certain limits, to write posts on the Talk pages of others. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm curious about whether certain comments and actions are prudent, helpful, wise.
Vmavanti (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC) - Regarding "I don't know who that is, and since you haven't provided a link, I can't easily find out". How long have you been using the internet? You really don't know how you would solve that conundrum?
Vmavanti (talk) 23:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)- Girth Summit -- I consider Vmavanti's retorts to you to be highly rude, and I'm very sorry that they saw fit to lambaste you as they did. Talk pages, mine included, are open to all. Btw, Gladys Kravitz was a colorful character from the 1960s American TV show "Bewitched," and again, that reference was also inappropriate and their entire demeanor uncalled for, even apart from the fact that you are an admin. I am declining to respond any further to him/her. - JGabbard (talk) 03:42, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Vmavanti, if by 'peeking into neighbor's windows' you mean 'looking at my watchlist, which includes the talk pages of numerous editors I've interacted with in the past', then the answer is 'daily'. You've seen this phenomenon before because it is entirely commonplace for other people to join (not interrupt) discussions on what are public talk pages - you surely can't have expected to be able to question JGabbard's competence in private? Notwithstanding your coyness about what you meant by the Kravitz remark (I'm still none the wiser - never having watched the show, I'm not sure what I'm meant to infer from the comparison), you say that you are in favour of simple, direct language, so I will be frank: I thought your question about whether they understood notability was quite silly, in light of what they had just said to you, so I pointed out that if what they said was true, there would be no question of notability. I did not comment on your follow-on question, asking whether they would be willing to add sourcing to the article to demonstrate the truth of what they said - that seemed reasonable, so I left it alone.
- Now, I don't imagine that JGabbard wants the pair of us bickering on their talk page, and they have said that they no longer want to respond to you. If you want to continue to discuss talk page etiquette, you would be welcome to do so on my talk. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 09:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Girth Summit -- I consider Vmavanti's retorts to you to be highly rude, and I'm very sorry that they saw fit to lambaste you as they did. Talk pages, mine included, are open to all. Btw, Gladys Kravitz was a colorful character from the 1960s American TV show "Bewitched," and again, that reference was also inappropriate and their entire demeanor uncalled for, even apart from the fact that you are an admin. I am declining to respond any further to him/her. - JGabbard (talk) 03:42, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don't try to be unconventional, but it does work out that way sometimes. I'm talking about prudence. How often do you peek into the neighbors' windows? I'm leaving aside whether you have some connection to JGabbard, so if there's some understanding that you speak for this person, then I guess it's okay. I've seen this phenomenon before, and I'm trying to understand it: Two people have a conversation, then someone shows up, interrupts the conversation, often trying to bring it to a halt. It's something like ventriloquism. Given that discussion is the foundation of Wikipedia, this strikes me as bad form, as does tut-tutting simple, direct questions. I know that we're free, within certain limits, to write posts on the Talk pages of others. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm curious about whether certain comments and actions are prudent, helpful, wise.
- Vmavanti, no, I haven't. If you'd like to give me a link I'll look at it; alternatively, you could just explain what you mean? I don't accept that commenting on a talk page equates to butting in: I've never heard anyone say anything like that before here, it seems unconventional. GirthSummit (blether) 23:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- You feel that butting in is productive and helpful? Have you done an internet search for Mrs. Kravitz yet?
- Vmavanti, the (talk page stalker) template is widely used, and even comes with a link to a humorous essay explaining what it means - I think it fits in just fine with collegiality. I'm not sure what you mean by addressing me as Mrs. Kravitz (I don't know who that is, and since you haven't provided a link, I can't easily find out), but I'm happy to assume that it's friendly banter and not an insult. Please don't tell me not to butt in though - absent a request from JGabbard that I don't post here, I'll make whatever observations I wish. Best GirthSummit (blether) 17:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- If "Weary Blues" has been a "topic of academic works", would you be willing to add sourced material to the article using those works as sources?
Vmavanti (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Don't butt in, Mrs. Kravitz. That's treating people like babies who can't speak for themselves. This doesn't involve you. There was no offense intended in the question. It's a simple question of fact. It deserves an answer. It's civil and proper to answer plain, direct questions.
- (talk page stalker) Vmavanti, JGabbard said that the song is the topic of academic works - it sounds like they have a solid understanding of Wikipedia's rules about notability. GirthSummit (blether) 16:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Do you understand the differences between the everday use of the word "notable" and Wikipedia's rules about Notability?
- People on Wikipedia have a habit of taking literal questions figuratively. I discourage that kind of thing. I avoid it because encyclopedias are about facts, not opinions, agendas, or reading between the lines. I encourage people to read the lines rather than the blank spaces between them. Figurative language takes us into the clouds and is best left to poets. I'm an American with his feet happily on terra firma, though I do own a West Highland terrier who also loves terra firma—but he's an American Westie, right? I can see why people are afraid to talk to me. I'll take honest American plain speaking, insults even, over deception and concealment any day of the week. The phenomenon I referred to earlier? The ventriloquist act? I know what you're doing. I admit, it took me a while to figure out. I had to see it happen several times. Then calling me "coy", something that has never happened, was also a giveaway. I don't care much for this kind of thing. Very likely it will self-destruct.
Vmavanti (talk) 14:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)- Vmavanti, I have literally no idea what you're talking about. Ventriloquist act? You know what I'm doing? Please feel free to explain, but again I'd urge you to do it on my talk page, rather than JGabbard's - your continuing to comment here after they have indicated that they don't intend to respond to you any further could be seen as intrusive. GirthSummit (blether) 14:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- People on Wikipedia have a habit of taking literal questions figuratively. I discourage that kind of thing. I avoid it because encyclopedias are about facts, not opinions, agendas, or reading between the lines. I encourage people to read the lines rather than the blank spaces between them. Figurative language takes us into the clouds and is best left to poets. I'm an American with his feet happily on terra firma, though I do own a West Highland terrier who also loves terra firma—but he's an American Westie, right? I can see why people are afraid to talk to me. I'll take honest American plain speaking, insults even, over deception and concealment any day of the week. The phenomenon I referred to earlier? The ventriloquist act? I know what you're doing. I admit, it took me a while to figure out. I had to see it happen several times. Then calling me "coy", something that has never happened, was also a giveaway. I don't care much for this kind of thing. Very likely it will self-destruct.
- This smokescreen has obscured the question I came here to ask JGabbard: If "Weary Blues" has been a "topic of academic works", would you be willing to add sourced material to the article using those works as sources? Now that's a simple, relevant question that ought to be easy to answer.
Vmavanti (talk) 14:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- This smokescreen has obscured the question I came here to ask JGabbard: If "Weary Blues" has been a "topic of academic works", would you be willing to add sourced material to the article using those works as sources? Now that's a simple, relevant question that ought to be easy to answer.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, JGabbard
Thank you for creating America Will Always Stand.
User:Girth Summit, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Any chance you could reformat the references? They are listed separately, but I think that ref 1 and 4 are the same book, as are ref 2 and 3. Publisher, page number and ISBN would all be helpful too to help readers verify the information. Thanks
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
GirthSummit (blether) 16:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit:I will look into reformatting at least one of them when I am able to revisit the project, if no one else has done so in the meantime. - JGabbard (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- JGabbard, thanks. With online sources I'd do it myself, but not having the books I can't add page numbers - better for someone who has access to the offline source to do it. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 18:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rubber Soul - The Beatles.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rubber Soul - The Beatles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of one-hit wonders in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Into the Night (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Laura Branigan 'Dim All the Lights' US Dance Club Songs chart peak
Hi, just wondering where you sourced the US Dance chart peak for Laura Branigan's "Dim All the Lights" from, as it is not currently listed on her chart history on the Billboard site. I've noticed that the site is missing some peaks for some artists, but if you could provide another source, that would be appreciated.Nqr9 (talk) 04:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- I simply imported that entry from the notation which is already on the song article. - JGabbard (talk) 10:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know what you're referring to, sorry. The only reference cited for Billboard Dance Club Songs peaks on the page is the Billboard URL, which does not display the peak.Nqr9 (talk) 11:56, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Category:Steve Dahl songs has been nominated for deletion
Category:Steve Dahl songs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Something 'Bout You Baby I Like, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Klein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Timothy - Buoys.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Timothy - Buoys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
Hello. Please see this discussion. Bionic (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Woodstock (song)
In your edit of 05:44, 24 December 2019 of Woodstock (song), you introduced the markup [[UK Singles Chart|UK]] <ref>{{cite web|url= |title=Official Charts Company |website=Officialcharts.com |date= |accessdate=2019-12-24}}</ref>. Two problems, one fix: {{cite web}} requires a valid URL. The accessdate parameter also requires a valid URL. I commented out the ref for now, but will you please edit the article and supply a valid URL in support of UK Singles Chart? —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem! — JGabbard (talk) 01:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mel and Tim songs
A tag has been placed on Category:Mel and Tim songs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kimberly Klacik, Candidate for Maryland's 7th Congressional district.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Kimberly Klacik, Candidate for Maryland's 7th Congressional district.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kimberly Klacik, Candidate for Maryland's 7th Congressional district.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Kimberly Klacik, Candidate for Maryland's 7th Congressional district.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kimberly Klacik, Candidate for Maryland's 7th Congressional district.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Kimberly Klacik, Candidate for Maryland's 7th Congressional district.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
|
This is Don Mansfield. Drmjr78 (talk) 03:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC) |
Hi, Don! Many thanks for the burger bro! :-) - JGabbard (talk) 03:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
A couple of discretionary sanctions notifications
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 11:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC).
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 11:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC).
This edit is a BLP violation, and your edit summary is especially offensive. Bishonen | tålk 11:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC).
- It wasn't my edit; I only restored what had already been there previously. The edit summary reflects not my own opinion so much as prevailing attitudes in political circles. WP:BLP cannot be used as cover for politicians classified as RINOs by WP:RS. Be it offensive or not, Romney certainly has this type of coverage, so how can he be an exception? JGabbard (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- If you restore content that has been removed as belonging in an "enemies list", you take responsibility for it. It's not useful to tell me, here, on your own talkpage, that there are reliable sources. The trick is in providing those sources in the article. Bishonen | tålk 20:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC).
Nomination of Trump 2024: The World After Trump for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump 2024: The World After Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump 2024: The World After Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slatersteven (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Hmm does this sanction still stand? I see other entries at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log with one expired, but not exactly about this. In case it stands, this movie is somewhat under the topic (conspiracy theories propaganda) and thus risky territory... —PaleoNeonate – 00:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the word of caution, Paleo. The topic is different and the pertinent phraseology was added just a few hours ago, but either way will take that under advisement. Its deletion discussion is looking anything but favorable right now anyway. - JGabbard (talk) 01:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trump 2024 - The World After Trump.png
Thanks for uploading File:Trump 2024 - The World After Trump.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Archiving talk page
Hi, JGabbard, You have over 400 notices/discussions on your user talk page which makes it difficult to navigate. Please consider archiving or deleting old messages that are no longer relevant, say, those over a year old.Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 16:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Liz: After perusing the page detailing the archiving technique, I have no interest in navigating its complexity, nor am I feeling a compelling urge to do that in the first place. But thank you for the suggestion. I may choose to revisit it in the future. - JGabbard (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- JGabbard,I can set it up for you if you like. You just have to stick a template at the top of the page and a bot will do the heavy lifting. Ping me if you're interested, ignore me if not... GirthSummit (blether) 23:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sure Girth, if you're willing to do that, go for it! Thanks very much. - JGabbard (talk) 01:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- JGabbard, that ought to do it. Nothing for you to do now, a bot ought to swing by at some point and wave its wand. GirthSummit (blether) 05:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Excellent, thanks again! I appreciate your help. - JGabbard (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Threads that don't have a timestamp will not be automatically archived, so you may want to move/delete them at your discretion. It would be possible to find when they were created and add a timestamp, but considering that they're old and that some threads were also blanked in the past, it may be more trouble than worth. If you need to prevent the bot from archiving particular threads, they can also be marked with {{subst:DNAU}}. —PaleoNeonate – 03:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Noted, thanks, Paleo. Is there a way to access and/or index the archive? - JGabbard (talk) 11:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- The {{Talk header}} template above should automatically display links to archive pages when they'll exist (and also allow to search them). —PaleoNeonate – 12:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- I noticed that because the
|count=parameter was wrong the pages the bot created were not visible for the template to auto-index them. I have moved the pages and adjusted the parameter. Feel free to ping me if any trouble surfaces, —PaleoNeonate – 09:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)- PaleoNeonate, thanks for fixing my mess - that count parameter was my bad. GirthSummit (blether) 09:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: the intention was good and to err human.
Speaking of errors there's a redirect I inadvertently left at User talk:JGabbard/Archive 9 but then CSD tagged for technical deletion. —PaleoNeonate – 10:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- PaleoNeonate, gone, cheers GirthSummit (blether) 10:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: the intention was good and to err human.
- PaleoNeonate, thanks for fixing my mess - that count parameter was my bad. GirthSummit (blether) 09:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Noted, thanks, Paleo. Is there a way to access and/or index the archive? - JGabbard (talk) 11:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Threads that don't have a timestamp will not be automatically archived, so you may want to move/delete them at your discretion. It would be possible to find when they were created and add a timestamp, but considering that they're old and that some threads were also blanked in the past, it may be more trouble than worth. If you need to prevent the bot from archiving particular threads, they can also be marked with {{subst:DNAU}}. —PaleoNeonate – 03:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Excellent, thanks again! I appreciate your help. - JGabbard (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- JGabbard, that ought to do it. Nothing for you to do now, a bot ought to swing by at some point and wave its wand. GirthSummit (blether) 05:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sure Girth, if you're willing to do that, go for it! Thanks very much. - JGabbard (talk) 01:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- JGabbard,I can set it up for you if you like. You just have to stick a template at the top of the page and a bot will do the heavy lifting. Ping me if you're interested, ignore me if not... GirthSummit (blether) 23:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
_US_cover.jpg){kind=link}
_US_cover.jpg){kind=link}
![18:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JGabbard/Archive_3#c-RonBot-2018-12-28T18:02:00.000Z-File:Sorry_Suzanne"_-_The_Hollies.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Rhythm_Heritage.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Rhythm_Heritage.jpg){kind=link}
_-_James_Taylor.jpg){kind=link}
_-_James_Taylor.jpg){kind=link}
_colored_vinyl_image.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_colored_vinyl_image.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Scott_McKenzie.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
"Jessica Jones (singer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Jessica Jones (singer). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#Jessica Jones (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Narky Blert (talk) 12:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberta Flack discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let It Be Me.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dang Me - Roger Miller.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dang Me - Roger Miller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ahab the Arab - Ray Stevens.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ahab the Arab - Ray Stevens.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
A bit late but
An IP editor recently undid these edits of yours to Vicarius Filii Dei (which is what brought them to my attention), where you cited this source to claim that the phrase "Vicarius Filii Dei" was consistently used for centuries in papal canons and other Catholic publications.
However, that source is a single primary source that fails to demonstrate a trend. It also does not discuss the use of the title "Vicar of the Son of God" in Catholic history. It does not even refer to the pope as the Vicar of the Son of God. It is not even about the pope, but Fernando Póo being appointed over Thailand (Rivi Muniensis) as a Vicar of the Apostles (vicariatu apostolico). It was not even signed by the pope. The closest it comes to the pope was that it was issued by some bishops on behalf of an office the pope is technically in charge of.
However, I see that you have since moved on to music edits, where I can only assume that you are editing far more in line with our policies and guidelines (such as WP:V and WP:NOR). May you have plenty of fun making good edits there. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)