User talk:Kafkasmurat

VikiProje Türkiye'ye davet / Invitation to join WikiProject Turkey

Merhaba, sizin VikiProje Türkiye'ye katılabileceğinizi düşündük. Ayrıca yalnız başınıza ya da diğer kullanıcılarla birlikte Türkiye ile ilgili maddeleri düzenleyip geliştirebilirsiniz. Eğer projemize katılmak istiyorsanız lütfen katılımcılar sayfasını ziyaret edin ve adınızı yazın ya da projenin tartışma sayfasına tıklayın. Eğer herhangi bir sorunuz varsa benimle ya da bir başka VikiProje Türkiye üyesi ile bağlantı kurabilirsiniz. Hi, I was thinking that maybe you would like to join the WikiProject Turkey. There you can also find and contact users who are trying to improve Turkey-related articles. If you would like to get involved, just visit the participants page and/or inquire at the project's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or other member of the WikiProject Turkey.

--Absar 10:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

--dmy.info author (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Uyghur Scouting

Can you help render Tayyar Bol (Be Prepared), the Scout Motto, into Uyghur script? Thanks! Chris 06:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Please see

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Armenia-Azerbaijan enforcementDrmies (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Pan-Turkism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. No such talk of hate speech. Drmies (talk) 13:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

It's a fact. The article must be reviewed. Is it wrong to warn about mistakes? Talk pages are there for it. --Kafkasmurat (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Armenian Genocide recognition shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Երևանցի ^talk 20:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

@Yerevantsi: That's fascism. Some people of a cause offense every other ideas. Why didn't you write this to reverter? He/She started first.--Kafkasmurat (talk) 21:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

See WP:CIVIL. Calling my actions "fascism" is not going to get you anywhere. That paragraph is only relevant to the Armenian Genocide denial page, while you're copy-pasting it in several articles that have nothing to do with the denial of the Armenian Genocide. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

@Yerevantsi: I wrote this in 3 articles because the case was there. I didn't add new information. I just said this punishement is no more. And i wrote ECHR decision about the case. It'is copied from there. --Kafkasmurat (talk) 22:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

And how is it relevant to the recognition of the Armenian Genocide? --Երևանցի ^talk 22:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

:::@Yerevantsi: The case was mentioned there. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenian_Genocide_recognition&oldid=587669372#Developments_since_2000 It was writing : "On March 8, 2007, Turkish nationalist Doğu Perinçek became the first person convicted by a court of law for denying the Armenian Genocide, found guilty by a Swiss district court in Lausanne. Perinçek appealed the verdict.[118] The conviction was upheld by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court on December 12, 2007." And i added its reversal. --Kafkasmurat (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC

It's so sad for a free encyclopedia. --Kafkasmurat (talk) 11:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 01:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kafkasmurat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't harm anyone. I only said something at talk page. I have references from European Court for Human Rights and Reuters. Also, i'm not blocked from editing. I was replying to a reverter. I am not intending anymore. I was adding a reversal for a court decision. A court had punished a Turk because of denying Armenian genocide. It's reverted and it's no more. I addded a sentence saying this. But Armenians insulted me and this led to a block. At last, they removed the punishment information and my addition too. It's because Wikipedia became lobbying area. Politics have gone this far. Free encyclopedia doesn't deserve it.Some users edit particular articles. Are they hired or just fanatics? I don't want to blame anyone, everybody should be able to say referenced things at talk pages. And mustn't be blocked for a couple of talk page edit.

Decline reason:

You can certainly be blocked for things you say about other people on talk pages. You were harassing and insulting to other users, and your unblock request suggests you don't understand that. only (talk) 11:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion of "Markus Raetz"

A page you created, Markus Raetz, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  —Josh3580_talk/hist 00:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Markus Raetz

It's not an article for speedy deletion. Please consider this. He has got really important sculptures. Major Wikis have it. --Kafkasmurat (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikis are not verifiable, reliable sources for establishing WP:Notability, as anyone can create any article, just like you did here. The fact that someone has created an article doesn't make the subject notable, per the community adopted standards. Please see the WP:ARTIST policy - it explains exactly what standards must be met. If the article explained how the artist meets those criteria, supported by verifiable, reliable sources, then it would not be eligible for speedy deletion. I would recommend submitting the article to WP:Articles for creation, where other editors can assist you in getting the article ready before it is posted into the main space. As far as the deletion of the current article, it will be up to a Wikipedia Administrator to review it, and decide if it qualifies for speedy deletion. Hope this helps, —Josh3580_talk/hist 02:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

I added some .edu links. There are plenty more about the artist. He's not a pop star. Understanding the notability lies in searching deep. Try .edu sites and major art platforms. Thanks.--Kafkasmurat (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kafkasmurat. You have new messages at Josh3580's talk page.
Message added 02:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 —Josh3580_talk/hist 02:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Markus Raetz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Markus Raetz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Raetz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  —Josh3580_talk/hist 16:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been reported

Here. Thanks, Étienne Dolet (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)