User talk:Mar4d

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

Your recent reverts on Rajput clans

Dear, You made an edit on the said article and modified the sourced contents. Have you gone through the given sources before making an attempt to edit. Just do it and also refer the talk page of the said article where I have given a line from from the source. For your easy reference I have mentioned the related page no. too. Thanks.--MahenSingha (Talk)

Yo

Yo man could you please go over to the Al-khalid tank and talk page and clear up all the confusion there.

help required

sir reference to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fakhar_Abbas

i am contacting you to help to revive this article please note the person has done a lot in different fields but he is quite media shy and don't want to be named for his achievements regarding the complaints about references here are few articles within Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22fakhar-i-abbas%22&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=5wg4hahw6m7r2haav0bu1r6yi

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Fakhar_Abbas.html

and also here are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMGLg1Ja_Qw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFIrA7TULxA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLfhCosAPbw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smS2r_WYQRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WuyUnJX0QU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spklHufXs5Y

https://www.google.com.pk/search?q=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&oq=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&aqs=chrome..69i57.11151j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

i can provide more if required please help restoring this page or let me know what else they require

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

POV by Indians on Mirpur article

Hi user Mard recently Indian editors have been adding a pov heading section on to the demographics section they then refused to add the same to the Jammu article citing reasons like "subheading not needed" obviously they want to reduce the users chances of reading the massacre article but want it to stand out on the Mirpur page and they have also censored the Jammu massacre link. Please help and remove it from Mirpur page as headings are not needed. 82.132.235.134 (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Question

• With your great experience and good record, why don't you apply as administrator of wiki?  M A A Z   T A L K  12:08, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Point 5353 issues

Hello Mar4d (talk · contribs),

Hope all is well. I would request you to drop by Point 5353, where my edits were reverted without any logical reason. I've responded in the talk page why my edits should be allowed, yet as usual, you know what happens. Your experience in dealing with this conundrum would be appreciated. Thanks. --PAKHIGHWAY (talk) 21:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Pakistan Army article 1965 section contains Indian claims but the Indian army page contains only Indian claims

Hi user Mard just noticed the 1965 subsection of the Pakistan army page has Indian claims of 471 tanks while the Indian army page has ZERO pakistani claims of 500 tanks nor does it contain neutral sources which state Pakistan lost 200 or 300 tanks. Please I would like someone to tell this to user Adamberger80 who seems to think the Indian Army page should only contain Indian sources but the Pakistani army page should cater for Indian claims also this double standard should not be allowed. Hranday8 (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

DRN notice

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Kashmir conflict#Nimitz replacement".The discussion is about the topic Kashmir conflict. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Kautilya3 (talk) 11:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)