User talk:OnlyNano: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:18, 6 February 2024

Archives

2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2025: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

Welcome!

Hi OnlyNano! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! TheTeam219 (talk)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi OnlyNano! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:59, Monday, January 29, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome OnlyNano! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:53, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for using the Bi topicon i made. (checked the code, same one, ID's even the same, 1921^[1]^[2]), i like ur signiature. Hope you have a good day! Babysharkboss2!! ^{Green Day (Talk Page btw)} 19:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tysm! OnlyNano 16:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no prob. signatures, and UBX's are neat. glad to have made your day! Babysharkboss2!! ^{AC/DC (Talk Page btw)} 19:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duelbits (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sirdog were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The "best" source currently present is from NewsBTC, as it appears independent and not routine, but searching the reliable sources noticeboard tells me seasoned editors were not being particularly impressed by it. Every other source appears routine, is sponsored, or otherwise does not meet the standards of the general notability criteria. In terms of neutrality, "and deemed legal by..." (why is it important to declare that the operation is legal) and "Duelbits was shelling out between..." ("shelling out" gives a negative connotation in Wikipedia's voice, which is not wanted) stood out the most to me.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duelbits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Sirdog (talk) 05:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thandeka (minister) reversion

Just curious. Why did you revert the edit to Thandeka (minister). It was sourced. I don't see a problem with changing the word "daughter" to "child." What was the potential vandalism? Jaireeodell (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I should have marked it as unexplained removal of content. You removed all mentions of LGBT affiliation in that article, with the minister. OnlyNano 18:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the vandalism warning, and replaced it with Level 1 unexplained removal of content. OnlyNano 19:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didn't make those edits. I'm just learning how these decisions work. I agree the edits that you reverted were unexplained. But ... actually, your reversion removed the content about LGBT affiliation. Was that you wanted to do? Jaireeodell (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry about that, it appears that it was on me. I think I saw the highlighting in the edit comparison incorrectly. I'll restore your edit, and remove the warning for ya. Thanks! OnlyNano 19:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Cup of Hockey 2028 and 2032

The NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has just confirmed that the NHL players will participate at the Olympics 2026 and 2030, as well as that there will be the World Cup of Hockey installments in 2028 and 2032. So, today and tomorrow there will be articles about it all over internet. You can add one or more sources, edit the Wikipedia page about the World Cup of Hockey and keep my changes of the page since what I added to the page is really true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.226.132.96 (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great, thank you! OnlyNano 15:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sloan Letters

Good morning. For over 37 years, I have been teaching visual optics at the university. Therefore, my expertise in visual acuity and optotypes is extensive. I'm not sure if this applies to you, but it seems rather unlikely. Upon noticing that your image of the Sloan letters, specifically the letter D, is incorrect, I couldn't help but try to communicate this to you. Since I couldn't find a way to do so, I wanted to change the image to the correct one. I am a very busy person and don't have time to engage in creating and/or modifying Wikipedia entries, as you can understand. However, I cannot overlook such a glaring error. Furthermore, you haven't even provided the reference to the original article by Louise L. Sloan. If you had done so and looked at it, you wouldn't have made the mistake of drawing the D incorrectly. Instead, you have cited a webpage that lacks any credibility compared to a scientific article. I kindly ask you to please remove this erroneous image as it is detrimental to the academic and research community. Shisheta (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I sincerely apologize for the oversight. I did not revert the changes due to me believing that your image was incorrect, it was because you removed an infobox, with appeared to remove more bytes than it should have to change an image. Upon further review, I noticed the original author of the page used an infobox for a diagnostic, which isn't necessary, and appears just to be there for styling. I have reverted the page back to your edit.

You have done the right thing by contacting me on my talk page to discuss it, before reverting the edit (this is something I have missed several times myself). I am glad that you have taken the time to edit Wikipedia, and I hope you find the time to contribute more, as your experience is valuable to the encyclopedia. Regards, and have a great day! OnlyNano 20:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. But your wrong image still appears in google search: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sloan_letters.svg

Please, delete it definitely. Bye Shisheta (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blake Orban (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blake Orban and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Trevor Connelly

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Trevor Connelly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DahSound (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

OnlyNano (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

Block ID: #24315972 (BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: ‪JBW‬ (talk • blocks)
Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ILuvMad". The reason given for ILuvMad's block is: "Persistent unconstructive editing".

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=OnlyNano}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=‪JBW‬ | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ILuvMad". The reason given for ILuvMad's block is: "Persistent unconstructive editing".</nowiki> | 3=127.0.0.1 | 4=24315972 | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ILuvMad". The reason given for ILuvMad's block is: "Persistent unconstructive editing".</nowiki> | 3=‪JBW‬ | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ILuvMad". The reason given for ILuvMad's block is: "Persistent unconstructive editing".</nowiki> | 3=‪JBW‬ | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

Message from OnlyNano:

Hello, I really need help fixing this issue. Other users sharing my IP address (see notice on my user page) are continuing to get me blocked from editing. Is it possible an administrator could block further registration of Wikipedia accounts on this IP address? The computers at my school clear all the cookies upon signing out, so I don't believe the cookie blocks are working. I, once again, confirm that I am not using any other accounts, and I am not the owner of User:ILuvMad, User:NickysTheThickiest, or the other one that I can't find on my talk page or archives (possibly because the autoblock was lifted).

At this point, I cannot do anything about being blocked, unless an admin can block registration on this IP, or come up with another idea to solve this issue. I really would like to edit Wikipedia tomorrow, and continue some of the articles I've been working on. I humbly ask that an administrator remove the autoblock, and help find a solution to this issue.

I would like to complement the above administrators, who declined/accepted the autoblock requests, for not blocking me permanently, even though it appears the evidence is not in my favor. Your understanding has really shown a lot to me, and it keeps me going every day, just the principal of WP:AGF. OnlyNano 23:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:OnlyNano&oldid=1201927023

[2] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Babysharkboss2&oldid=1173149132

[1]

[2]

@@ Line 120: / Line 120: @@
 If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Draft:Trevor Connelly|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3ATrevor+Connelly|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:DahSound|DahSound]] ([[User talk:DahSound|talk]]) 19:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
+{{unblock-auto|2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ILuvMad". The reason given for ILuvMad's block is: "Persistent unconstructive editing".</nowiki>|3=‪JBW‬|4=24315972}}
+'''Message from OnlyNano:'''
+Hello, I really need help fixing this issue. Other users sharing my IP address (see notice on my [[User:OnlyNano|user page]]) are continuing to get me blocked from editing. Is it possible an administrator could block further registration of Wikipedia accounts on this IP address? The computers at my school clear all the cookies upon signing out, so I don't believe the cookie blocks are working. I, once again, confirm that I am not using any other accounts, and I am not the owner of [[User:ILuvMad]], [[User:NickysTheThickiest]], or the other one that I can't find on my talk page or archives (possibly because the autoblock was lifted).
+At this point, I cannot do anything about being blocked, unless an admin can block registration on this IP, or come up with another idea to solve this issue. I really would like to edit Wikipedia tomorrow, and continue some of the articles I've been working on. I humbly ask that an administrator remove the autoblock, and help find a solution to this issue.
+I would like to complement the above administrators, who declined/accepted the autoblock requests, for not blocking ''me'' permanently, even though it appears the evidence is not in my favor. Your understanding has really shown a lot to me, and it keeps me going every day, just the principal of [[WP:AGF]]. <span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px blue; font-family:Papyrus color:#3399ff">[[User:OnlyNano|OnlyNano]]</span> 23:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)